Tanaka,Michi vs. HK

7 point match, Score is Tanaka,Michi: 7, HK: 4


This is the final of the "2013 World Championship Doubles Consultation" which was played in Monaco. Kostas Mitrelis and Haris Christidis constituted the greek national team and played the black checkers, where Michi and Tanaka from Japan played the white. As you will see both teams played an excellent match leaving minimal space for comments.


Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
World Champ. (-0,0028) Total Error World Champ. (-0,0022)
World Champ. (-0,0031) Checker Play World Champ. (-0,0026)
World Champ. (+0,0000) Cube Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
1,41 Performance Rating 1,11

Tanaka,Michi  HK 
World Champ. (-0,0025) Game 1 World Champ. (+0,0000)
World Champ. (-0,0028) Game 2 World Champ. (-0,0036)
World Champ. (-0,0027) Game 3 World Champ. (-0,0020)
World Champ. (-0,0029) Game 4 World Champ. (-0,0008)

Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
4 Move Errors 3(1)
-0,236(-4,56%) Equity lost (cost) -0,174(-2,60%)
     
0 Double Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Take Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
4 Total Error 3(1)
-0,236(-4,56%) Equity lost (cost) -0,174(-2,60%)
     
7 Jokers 6
+0,457(+44,13%) Luck -0,457(-44,13%)
     
World Champ. Level of Play World Champ.
1,41 Performance Rating 1,11

Location: Monaco
Played on: 8/12/2013
At: 3:19:00 AM

Event: Doubles
Round: Final

Tanaka,Michi: Elo= 1600, Exp=0

HK: Elo= 1730, Exp=18

 Game 1

7 point match, Score is Tanaka,Michi: 0, HK: 0

 
 31: 8/5 6/5 
XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:31:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-167
1.played3-ply8/5 6/5eq: +0,230
Player:
Opponent:
55,42% (G:16,54% B:0,75%)
44,58% (G:11,14% B:0,48%)
2.2-ply24/23 13/10eq: -0,010 (-0,240)
Player:
Opponent:
49,63% (G:13,41% B:0,61%)
50,37% (G:13,36% B:0,57%)
3.2-ply13/10 6/5eq: -0,014 (-0,244)
Player:
Opponent:
49,84% (G:13,64% B:0,61%)
50,16% (G:14,17% B:0,93%)
4.2-ply13/9eq: -0,032 (-0,262)
Player:
Opponent:
48,91% (G:13,70% B:0,73%)
51,09% (G:13,59% B:0,73%)
5.2-ply24/20eq: -0,038 (-0,268)
Player:
Opponent:
49,10% (G:12,21% B:0,52%)
50,90% (G:13,14% B:0,51%)
 
 64: 24/14 
XGID=-b---BD-B---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:64:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=163-167
1.played4-ply24/14eq: -0,333
Player:
Opponent:
42,73% (G:8,78% B:0,33%)
57,27% (G:17,45% B:0,63%)
2.4-ply24/18 13/9eq: -0,357 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
42,36% (G:10,15% B:0,49%)
57,64% (G:19,68% B:0,95%)
3.4-ply8/2 6/2eq: -0,357 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
41,35% (G:11,73% B:0,60%)
58,65% (G:18,77% B:0,95%)
4.3-ply13/3eq: -0,478 (-0,145)
Player:
Opponent:
38,91% (G:10,00% B:0,51%)
61,09% (G:19,90% B:1,20%)
5.3-ply13/9 13/7eq: -0,501 (-0,168)
Player:
Opponent:
38,95% (G:10,09% B:0,50%)
61,05% (G:20,86% B:1,75%)
 
 No double 
XGID=-a---BD-B--aeE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:00:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=163-157
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 57,27% (G:17,45% B:0,63%) 57,22% (G:17,66% B:0,63%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 42,73% (G:8,78% B:0,33%) 42,78% (G:8,82% B:0,33%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,237 +0,490
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,333
     Double/Take:+0,168 (-0,165)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,667)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 16,5%
 
 33: 24/21(2) 13/10(2) 
XGID=-a---BD-B--aeE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:33:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=163-157
1.played4-ply24/21(2) 13/10(2)eq: +0,436
Player:
Opponent:
59,48% (G:16,71% B:0,41%)
40,52% (G:5,71% B:0,16%)
2.4-ply13/7(2)eq: +0,430 (-0,006)
Player:
Opponent:
59,45% (G:19,93% B:0,60%)
40,55% (G:9,08% B:0,38%)
3.4-ply24/21(2) 6/3(2)eq: +0,425 (-0,011)
Player:
Opponent:
59,06% (G:16,69% B:0,36%)
40,94% (G:5,56% B:0,16%)
4.4-ply24/18(2)eq: +0,377 (-0,059)
Player:
Opponent:
59,01% (G:13,62% B:0,30%)
40,99% (G:5,65% B:0,15%)
5.3-ply13/10(2) 6/3(2)eq: +0,369 (-0,067)
Player:
Opponent:
58,02% (G:19,63% B:0,65%)
41,98% (G:8,97% B:0,34%)
 
 21: 24/22 14/13 
XGID=-a---BD-B-BaeC---c-e-B----:0:0:-1:21:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=151-157
1.playedXG Roller+24/22 14/13eq: -0,612
Player:
Opponent:
37,37% (G:5,42% B:0,17%)
62,63% (G:21,71% B:0,36%)
2.XG Roller+14/11eq: -0,636 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
36,17% (G:5,60% B:0,18%)
63,83% (G:19,90% B:0,52%)
3.3-ply14/13 8/6eq: -0,731 (-0,119)
Player:
Opponent:
34,51% (G:5,04% B:0,12%)
65,49% (G:22,06% B:0,51%)
4.2-ply6/3eq: -0,754 (-0,142)
Player:
Opponent:
34,27% (G:5,75% B:0,12%)
65,73% (G:23,15% B:0,77%)
5.2-ply24/21eq: -0,793 (-0,181)
Player:
Opponent:
34,69% (G:5,34% B:0,10%)
65,31% (G:25,91% B:0,65%)
 
 No double 
XGID=---a-BD-B-B-fC---c-e-B----:0:0:1:00:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=151-154
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 62,36% (G:22,57% B:0,42%) 62,66% (G:22,21% B:0,43%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 37,64% (G:5,44% B:0,18%) 37,34% (G:5,39% B:0,18%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,424 +0,881
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,623
     Double/Take:+0,594 (-0,029)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,377)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 6,7%
 
 66: 21/9(2) 
XGID=---a-BD-B-B-fC---c-e-B----:0:0:1:66:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=151-154
1.xgXG Roller++21/15(2) 10/4(2)eq: +1,031
Player:
Opponent:
77,43% (G:23,57% B:0,25%)
22,57% (G:3,02% B:0,10%)
2.playedXG Roller++21/9(2)eq: +1,016 (-0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
80,05% (G:19,36% B:0,21%)
19,95% (G:1,65% B:0,05%)
3.4-ply21/15(2) 8/2(2)eq: +0,964 (-0,067)
Player:
Opponent:
73,59% (G:20,88% B:0,24%)
26,41% (G:3,84% B:0,13%)
4.4-ply21/15(2) 13/1eq: +0,945 (-0,085)
Player:
Opponent:
70,98% (G:21,24% B:0,22%)
29,02% (G:4,59% B:0,17%)
5.3-ply21/15(2) 13/7(2)eq: +0,935 (-0,095)
Player:
Opponent:
74,54% (G:20,43% B:0,40%)
25,46% (G:3,21% B:0,08%)

Although very close, this position worths our attention as the "cubelessly" best choice 21/9(2) becomes second due to the higher gammon percentage of the other candidate 21/15(2), 10/4(2). Most probably next turn it will be too good/pass (or double/pass at worst) so it worths (for white) going for the gammon with the relative safety of black's future pass.


 
 64: 13/9 13/7 
XGID=---a-BD-BBB-fC---c-e------:0:0:-1:64:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=127-154
1.playedXG Roller++13/9 13/7eq: -1,033
Player:
Opponent:
19,95% (G:1,81% B:0,05%)
80,05% (G:21,38% B:0,24%)
2.XG Roller++13/7 8/4eq: -1,045 (-0,012)
Player:
Opponent:
19,72% (G:1,77% B:0,05%)
80,28% (G:22,32% B:0,25%)
3.XG Roller++8/2 6/2eq: -1,056 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
19,00% (G:1,80% B:0,05%)
81,00% (G:24,30% B:0,24%)
4.XG Roller++13/3eq: -1,058 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
19,22% (G:1,84% B:0,05%)
80,78% (G:24,13% B:0,25%)
5.XG Roller++22/18 13/7eq: -1,062 (-0,029)
Player:
Opponent:
17,95% (G:1,74% B:0,05%)
82,05% (G:23,92% B:0,26%)
 
 Double/Pass 
XGID=---a-BD-BBB-dC--acae------:0:0:1:00:0:0:0:7:10 Pip=127-144
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 80,13% (G:21,23% B:0,22%) 80,67% (G:22,12% B:0,25%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 19,87% (G:1,79% B:0,05%) 19,33% (G:1,75% B:0,05%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,803 +1,684
Cubeful Equities
     No double:+1,039
     Double/Take:+1,537 (+0,498)
played Double/Pass:+1,000 (-0,039)
 
Best Cube action: Too good to double / Pass
Percentage of wrong take needed to make the double decision right: 7,3%

Tanaka and Michi, having not only a big racing lead but also an good distribution, should have played on, going for the gammon. As mentioned earlier in the vast majority of the next sequences it will be a pass for black and white have some gammonish jokers next turn (e.g. 66,55,33).

Against a weak player doubling could be correct as he could possibly make a huge blunder by taking the cube.


 
 Wins 1pt. 

Game Summary:

Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
World Champ. (-0,0025) Total Error World Champ. (+0,0000)
World Class (-0,0051) Checker Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
World Champ. (+0,0000) Cube Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
1,27 Performance Rating 0,00
0 Move Errors 0
-0,015(-0,10%) Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Double Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Take Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Total Error 0
-0,015(-0,10%) Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
1 Jokers 0
+1,014(+6,35%) Luck -1,014(-6,35%)

 Game 2

7 point match, Score is Tanaka,Michi: 1, HK: 0

 
 41: 24/23 13/9 
XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-167
1.played4-ply24/23 13/9eq: -0,018
Player:
Opponent:
49,70% (G:13,71% B:0,59%)
50,30% (G:13,20% B:0,57%)
2.4-ply13/9 6/5eq: -0,048 (-0,030)
Player:
Opponent:
49,47% (G:13,45% B:0,60%)
50,53% (G:14,44% B:0,93%)
3.4-ply24/23 24/20eq: -0,053 (-0,035)
Player:
Opponent:
49,12% (G:12,11% B:0,54%)
50,88% (G:13,15% B:0,47%)
4.4-ply13/8eq: -0,063 (-0,045)
Player:
Opponent:
48,85% (G:13,18% B:0,63%)
51,15% (G:14,12% B:0,64%)
5.3-ply24/20 6/5eq: -0,065 (-0,047)
Player:
Opponent:
49,13% (G:12,35% B:0,61%)
50,87% (G:13,92% B:0,62%)
 
 41: 6/2* 2/1*  
XGID=-b----E-CA--eD---c-e---AA-:0:0:-1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=162-167
1.played4-ply6/2* 2/1* eq: -0,121
Player:
Opponent:
46,82% (G:12,60% B:0,46%)
53,18% (G:15,39% B:0,85%)
2.4-ply24/23 13/9eq: -0,169 (-0,048)
Player:
Opponent:
45,87% (G:11,81% B:0,52%)
54,13% (G:16,17% B:0,77%)
3.4-ply24/23 24/20eq: -0,176 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
46,00% (G:10,39% B:0,44%)
54,00% (G:15,43% B:0,55%)
4.4-ply24/23 6/2* eq: -0,181 (-0,060)
Player:
Opponent:
45,68% (G:11,07% B:0,44%)
54,32% (G:15,67% B:0,78%)
5.3-ply13/8eq: -0,185 (-0,065)
Player:
Opponent:
45,45% (G:11,47% B:0,45%)
54,55% (G:16,07% B:0,78%)
 
 61: Bar/24*  
XGID=-b----E-CA--eD---c-d----aB:0:0:1:61:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=165-162
1.played3-plyBar/24* eq: +0,061
Player:
Opponent:
51,43% (G:14,48% B:0,77%)
48,57% (G:12,00% B:0,59%)
 
 44: Bar/21 24/16* 13/9 
XGID=ab----E-CA--eD---c-d----AA:0:0:-1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=164-186
1.played4-plyBar/21 24/16* 13/9eq: +0,287
Player:
Opponent:
56,46% (G:15,84% B:0,89%)
43,54% (G:11,11% B:0,52%)
2.4-plyBar/21 24/20 24/16* eq: +0,216 (-0,071)
Player:
Opponent:
55,38% (G:12,98% B:0,59%)
44,62% (G:10,46% B:0,35%)
3.3-plyBar/21 24/20 13/9(2)eq: +0,159 (-0,129)
Player:
Opponent:
53,61% (G:13,83% B:0,70%)
46,39% (G:11,30% B:0,42%)
4.3-plyBar/21 24/20(2) 13/9eq: +0,143 (-0,144)
Player:
Opponent:
52,86% (G:13,28% B:0,62%)
47,14% (G:10,03% B:0,30%)
5.2-plyBar/21 13/9(3)eq: +0,115 (-0,172)
Player:
Opponent:
52,32% (G:14,68% B:0,85%)
47,68% (G:12,66% B:0,76%)
 
 32: Bar/23 Bar/22 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--ac-d----AB:0:0:1:32:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=180-170
1.played3-plyBar/23 Bar/22eq: -0,280
Player:
Opponent:
43,38% (G:10,70% B:0,44%)
56,62% (G:14,99% B:0,75%)
 
 No double 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--ac-d--AAA-:0:0:-1:00:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=175-170
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 56,82% (G:15,01% B:0,77%) 56,82% (G:15,00% B:0,77%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 43,18% (G:10,64% B:0,41%) 43,18% (G:10,63% B:0,41%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,177 +0,350
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,287
     Double/Take:+0,118 (-0,169)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,713)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 16,1%
 
 53: 8/3* 6/3 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--ac-d--AAA-:0:0:-1:53:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=175-170
1.played3-ply8/3* 6/3eq: +0,305
Player:
Opponent:
56,46% (G:17,47% B:1,09%)
43,54% (G:10,88% B:0,53%)
2.3-ply21/16 9/6eq: +0,170 (-0,135)
Player:
Opponent:
54,81% (G:12,13% B:0,43%)
45,19% (G:11,56% B:0,28%)
3.2-ply24/21 16/11eq: +0,099 (-0,206)
Player:
Opponent:
52,22% (G:12,44% B:0,44%)
47,78% (G:11,01% B:0,34%)
4.2-ply21/16 13/10eq: +0,085 (-0,220)
Player:
Opponent:
52,36% (G:12,77% B:0,55%)
47,64% (G:13,02% B:0,55%)
5.2-ply24/16eq: +0,056 (-0,248)
Player:
Opponent:
51,74% (G:11,71% B:0,45%)
48,26% (G:12,64% B:0,38%)
 
 62: Bar/23 24/18 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--ab-c--bAAA:0:0:1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=178-162
1.played4-plyBar/23 24/18eq: -0,472
Player:
Opponent:
39,69% (G:8,96% B:0,35%)
60,31% (G:17,92% B:0,93%)
2.4-plyBar/23 13/7eq: -0,535 (-0,063)
Player:
Opponent:
39,00% (G:9,27% B:0,39%)
61,00% (G:20,75% B:1,50%)
3.3-plyBar/23 8/2eq: -0,601 (-0,129)
Player:
Opponent:
37,60% (G:9,01% B:0,34%)
62,40% (G:21,10% B:1,51%)
 
 No double 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--abAc--bB--:0:0:-1:00:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=170-162
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 60,31% (G:17,92% B:0,93%) 60,31% (G:17,93% B:0,93%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 39,69% (G:8,96% B:0,35%) 39,69% (G:8,97% B:0,35%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,299 +0,607
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,472
     Double/Take:+0,381 (-0,091)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,528)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 12,9%
 
 41: 9/5 6/5 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD--abAc--bB--:0:0:-1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=170-162
1.played3-ply9/5 6/5eq: +0,499
Player:
Opponent:
60,70% (G:19,19% B:0,94%)
39,30% (G:9,15% B:0,39%)
2.2-ply24/20 21/20eq: +0,310 (-0,189)
Player:
Opponent:
56,80% (G:15,33% B:0,59%)
43,20% (G:8,61% B:0,27%)
3.2-ply21/16eq: +0,301 (-0,199)
Player:
Opponent:
57,13% (G:15,43% B:0,67%)
42,87% (G:10,55% B:0,38%)
4.2-ply16/15 13/9eq: +0,275 (-0,224)
Player:
Opponent:
55,97% (G:16,85% B:0,86%)
44,03% (G:11,20% B:0,55%)
5.2-ply24/23 13/9eq: +0,266 (-0,233)
Player:
Opponent:
55,85% (G:16,45% B:0,79%)
44,15% (G:11,12% B:0,49%)
 
 64: 18/8 
XGID=-a--a-E-Ca--dD---bAbb-bB--:0:0:1:64:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=170-157
1.playedXG Roller++18/8eq: -0,709
Player:
Opponent:
34,08% (G:7,24% B:0,22%)
65,92% (G:17,04% B:0,78%)
2.XG Roller++8/2 6/2eq: -0,809 (-0,100)
Player:
Opponent:
33,21% (G:7,76% B:0,29%)
66,79% (G:21,28% B:1,13%)
3.XG Roller++13/9* 9/3eq: -0,922 (-0,213)
Player:
Opponent:
33,59% (G:7,19% B:0,29%)
66,41% (G:26,16% B:1,80%)
4.XG Roller++13/7 13/9* eq: -1,000 (-0,291)
Player:
Opponent:
33,00% (G:7,23% B:0,35%)
67,00% (G:29,56% B:2,46%)
5.1-ply13/3eq: -1,000 (-0,291)
Player:
Opponent:
31,34% (G:6,46% B:0,28%)
68,66% (G:24,88% B:1,65%)
 
 No double 
XGID=-a--a-E-Da--dD---b-bb-bB--:0:0:-1:00:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=160-157
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 65,86% (G:17,20% B:0,82%) 65,93% (G:16,99% B:0,80%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 34,14% (G:7,31% B:0,24%) 34,07% (G:7,19% B:0,23%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,421 +0,861
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,710
     Double/Take:+0,668 (-0,042)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,290)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 11,2%

Kostas: "We were thinking of doubling here as they had a big advantage, however we didn't see any market loosers so we decided to wait for a roll. On the other hand I believe that there are many players that would pass this cube"


 
 61: 21/15 16/15 
XGID=-a--a-E-Da--dD---b-bb-bB--:0:0:-1:61:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=160-157
1.played3-ply21/15 16/15eq: +0,696
Player:
Opponent:
66,39% (G:16,12% B:0,76%)
33,61% (G:7,38% B:0,20%)
2.3-ply16/9eq: +0,598 (-0,098)
Player:
Opponent:
63,44% (G:17,95% B:0,83%)
36,56% (G:8,59% B:0,31%)
3.3-ply21/20 16/10eq: +0,596 (-0,100)
Player:
Opponent:
62,83% (G:18,97% B:0,87%)
37,17% (G:8,78% B:0,34%)
4.3-ply24/23 16/10eq: +0,586 (-0,110)
Player:
Opponent:
63,15% (G:17,68% B:0,80%)
36,85% (G:8,86% B:0,31%)
5.3-ply13/6eq: +0,560 (-0,136)
Player:
Opponent:
62,76% (G:17,74% B:0,85%)
37,24% (G:8,95% B:0,34%)
 
 51: 13/8 6/5 
XGID=-a----E-D-b-dD---b-bb-bB--:0:0:1:51:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=160-150
1.playedXG Roller++13/8 6/5eq: -0,851
Player:
Opponent:
31,00% (G:6,25% B:0,19%)
69,00% (G:17,48% B:0,83%)
2.XG Roller++13/7eq: -0,893 (-0,042)
Player:
Opponent:
29,95% (G:6,12% B:0,19%)
70,05% (G:16,85% B:0,81%)
3.XG Roller++8/7 6/1* eq: -0,946 (-0,094)
Player:
Opponent:
30,02% (G:6,12% B:0,16%)
69,98% (G:19,26% B:1,10%)
4.XG Roller++8/3 6/5eq: -0,960 (-0,108)
Player:
Opponent:
30,24% (G:6,02% B:0,21%)
69,76% (G:20,31% B:1,18%)
5.3-ply8/2eq: -0,977 (-0,125)
Player:
Opponent:
29,33% (G:6,08% B:0,22%)
70,67% (G:19,40% B:1,01%)
 
 Double/Take 
XGID=-a---AD-E-b-dC---b-bb-bB--:0:0:-1:00:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=154-150
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 69,42% (G:17,34% B:0,79%) 69,48% (G:17,32% B:0,83%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 30,58% (G:6,12% B:0,20%) 30,52% (G:6,17% B:0,20%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,507 +1,043
Cubeful Equities
     No double:+0,821 (-0,046)
played Double/Take:+0,867
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,133)
 
Best Cube action: Double / Take

Excellent cube here from Haris and Kostas. Take is clear as 2point anchors are very strong (Kleitsas, once, took a much "harder" cube by just owning the 23pt and was validated by XG at my suprise) , provided that there is enough "timming" which can be improved in that case.


 
 42: 24/20* 13/11 
XGID=-a---AD-E-b-dC---b-bb-bB--:1:1:-1:42:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=154-150
1.played4-ply24/20* 13/11eq: +0,538
Player:
Opponent:
72,08% (G:20,12% B:1,05%)
27,92% (G:4,88% B:0,18%)
2.4-ply24/20* 20/18eq: +0,490 (-0,048)
Player:
Opponent:
70,93% (G:18,43% B:0,90%)
29,07% (G:5,20% B:0,17%)
3.4-ply24/20* 15/13eq: +0,482 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
70,05% (G:19,84% B:1,03%)
29,95% (G:5,51% B:0,21%)
4.3-ply24/20* 8/6eq: +0,381 (-0,158)
Player:
Opponent:
65,97% (G:20,17% B:1,18%)
34,03% (G:6,84% B:0,21%)
5.2-ply13/11 13/9eq: +0,336 (-0,202)
Player:
Opponent:
66,16% (G:16,65% B:0,75%)
33,84% (G:8,11% B:0,35%)
 
 64: Bar/15 
XGID=-----aD-E-b-cCa--b-bb-bB-A:1:1:1:64:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-144
1.xgXG Roller++Bar/21 8/2eq: -0,540
Player:
Opponent:
27,74% (G:5,38% B:0,18%)
72,26% (G:20,17% B:1,13%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/21 13/7eq: -0,578 (-0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
27,61% (G:5,06% B:0,19%)
72,39% (G:23,13% B:1,42%)
3.playedXG Roller++Bar/15eq: -0,597 (-0,057)
Player:
Opponent:
25,61% (G:4,09% B:0,14%)
74,39% (G:20,04% B:1,02%)

This is the play that most people would choose (including myself) but blacks have a strong board with many hitting numbers and any hit would make it easier for them to run their checkers home. Bar/21, 13/7 would be correct if whites had 2 spares on their 13pt but now 8/2 (although a bit ugly) is best. One benefit from staying to the 21pt (which is rather safe) is that next turn whites may advance their anchor to the 21pt and better control the outfield, making it difficult for blacks to break their 15pt and run their checkers home.


 
 54: 15/11 15/10*  
XGID=-----aD-E-b-cCaA-b-bb-bB--:1:1:-1:54:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=164-144
1.xgXG Roller+20/16 15/10* eq: +0,623
Player:
Opponent:
74,34% (G:22,59% B:1,27%)
25,66% (G:4,24% B:0,18%)
2.playedXG Roller+15/11 15/10* eq: +0,620 (-0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
73,89% (G:23,31% B:1,29%)
26,11% (G:4,09% B:0,15%)
3.4-ply15/10* 13/9eq: +0,606 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
72,93% (G:24,22% B:1,46%)
27,07% (G:4,68% B:0,24%)
4.4-ply15/10* 10/6eq: +0,586 (-0,037)
Player:
Opponent:
72,60% (G:23,16% B:1,27%)
27,40% (G:4,48% B:0,19%)
5.3-ply15/10* 11/7eq: +0,575 (-0,048)
Player:
Opponent:
71,93% (G:23,96% B:1,43%)
28,07% (G:5,23% B:0,23%)
 
 61: Bar/18 
XGID=-----aD-E---cCba-b-bb-bB-A:1:1:1:61:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-135
1.playedXG Roller+Bar/18eq: -0,660
Player:
Opponent:
25,37% (G:3,60% B:0,15%)
74,63% (G:25,01% B:1,38%)
2.XG Roller+Bar/24 8/2eq: -0,671 (-0,011)
Player:
Opponent:
23,66% (G:3,77% B:0,14%)
76,34% (G:22,20% B:1,30%)
3.XG Roller+Bar/24 13/7eq: -0,673 (-0,013)
Player:
Opponent:
25,25% (G:3,78% B:0,16%)
74,75% (G:25,73% B:1,70%)

Now playing all the way (Bar/18) is better as it is the play that gives white some chances to make an advanced anchor next turn, or possibly improve their timming.


 
 62: 13/7* 7/5 
XGID=-----aD-E---cCba-bAbb-bB--:1:1:-1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-135
1.playedXG Roller++13/7* 7/5eq: +0,649 (+0,007)
Player:
Opponent:
73,79% (G:25,93% B:1,50%)
26,21% (G:3,80% B:0,16%)
2.xgXG Roller++13/7* 11/9eq: +0,642
Player:
Opponent:
73,29% (G:26,64% B:1,60%)
26,71% (G:4,43% B:0,23%)
3.XG Roller++13/7* 10/8eq: +0,629 (-0,013)
Player:
Opponent:
73,21% (G:25,44% B:1,41%)
26,79% (G:3,98% B:0,16%)
4.4-ply20/18 13/7* eq: +0,614 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
73,46% (G:23,85% B:1,24%)
26,54% (G:4,37% B:0,19%)
5.3-ply13/11 13/7* eq: +0,602 (-0,040)
Player:
Opponent:
72,23% (G:25,49% B:1,43%)
27,77% (G:4,75% B:0,18%)
 
 53: Cannot Move 
XGID=-----aD-E---bCba-b-bc-bB-A:1:1:1:53:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-127
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,765
Player:
Opponent:
22,68% (G:2,66% B:0,08%)
77,32% (G:28,18% B:1,34%)
 
 44: 11/7(2) 8/4(2) 
XGID=-----aD-E---bCba-b-bc-bB-A:1:1:-1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-127
1.xgXG Roller++13/9(2) 8/4(2)eq: +0,917
Player:
Opponent:
80,04% (G:35,17% B:1,82%)
19,96% (G:1,57% B:0,06%)
2.playedXG Roller++11/7(2) 8/4(2)eq: +0,901 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
79,81% (G:34,36% B:1,65%)
20,19% (G:1,57% B:0,06%)
3.XG Roller++20/16 13/9 8/4(2)eq: +0,900 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
80,34% (G:33,11% B:1,61%)
19,66% (G:1,66% B:0,07%)
4.XG Roller++20/16 10/6 8/4(2)eq: +0,889 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
79,93% (G:33,02% B:1,55%)
20,07% (G:1,58% B:0,07%)
5.4-ply20/16 11/7 8/4(2)eq: +0,853 (-0,065)
Player:
Opponent:
78,25% (G:33,70% B:1,62%)
21,75% (G:2,05% B:0,10%)
 
 66: Cannot Move 
XGID=-----aD-E---bC-a--bbcbbB-A:1:1:1:66:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-111
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,958
Player:
Opponent:
20,19% (G:1,29% B:0,04%)
79,81% (G:39,54% B:1,69%)
 
 54: 20/11 
XGID=-----aD-E---bC-a--bbcbbB-A:1:1:-1:54:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-111
1.played4-ply20/11eq: +0,977
Player:
Opponent:
81,15% (G:38,22% B:1,58%)
18,85% (G:0,96% B:0,04%)
2.4-ply20/15 13/9eq: +0,954 (-0,023)
Player:
Opponent:
80,18% (G:38,31% B:1,76%)
19,82% (G:1,30% B:0,06%)
3.4-ply20/15 10/6eq: +0,952 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
80,21% (G:38,11% B:1,61%)
19,79% (G:1,18% B:0,05%)
4.4-ply13/9 13/8eq: +0,923 (-0,055)
Player:
Opponent:
78,19% (G:39,94% B:1,97%)
21,81% (G:1,72% B:0,06%)
5.3-ply20/16 13/8eq: +0,936 (-0,042)
Player:
Opponent:
79,06% (G:39,09% B:1,87%)
20,94% (G:1,49% B:0,04%)
 
 62: Bar/23 13/7 
XGID=------D-E---bCaa--bbcbbB-A:1:1:1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=174-102
1.playedXG Roller+Bar/23 13/7eq: -0,884
Player:
Opponent:
18,14% (G:1,04% B:0,04%)
81,86% (G:28,41% B:1,11%)
2.XG Roller+Bar/23 8/2eq: -0,927 (-0,043)
Player:
Opponent:
17,55% (G:0,90% B:0,03%)
82,45% (G:30,73% B:1,34%)
3.XG Roller+Bar/17eq: -1,039 (-0,155)
Player:
Opponent:
18,42% (G:0,84% B:0,03%)
81,58% (G:42,71% B:1,78%)

Tanaka and Michi played the correct 13/7 which is superior to 8/2 as it creates better structure for making the critical 5 and 4 points next turn(s). Bar/17 now is clearly wrong as it increases blacks' gammons by a lot, does not improve whites' timming (which is already good). Finally keeping a spare checker on the 23 point could prove be very helpful in the future on hitting a long shot without having to break the anchor.


 
 64: 13/9 13/7 
XGID=------DAE---bBaa--bbcbbC--:1:1:-1:64:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-102
1.playedXG Roller++13/9 13/7eq: +0,907
Player:
Opponent:
82,28% (G:29,55% B:1,09%)
17,72% (G:0,88% B:0,03%)
2.XG Roller++11/5 10/6eq: +0,881 (-0,027)
Player:
Opponent:
81,21% (G:29,55% B:1,09%)
18,79% (G:0,99% B:0,03%)
3.4-ply11/7 10/4eq: +0,845 (-0,062)
Player:
Opponent:
80,90% (G:26,99% B:1,00%)
19,10% (G:1,10% B:0,04%)
4.4-ply13/9 11/5eq: +0,824 (-0,083)
Player:
Opponent:
79,72% (G:27,73% B:1,27%)
20,28% (G:1,55% B:0,06%)
5.3-ply13/7 10/6eq: +0,852 (-0,055)
Player:
Opponent:
80,71% (G:27,99% B:1,22%)
19,29% (G:1,30% B:0,03%)

Looks like a "Pay now or Pay later" problem. Charis and Kostas have seen the very clever play of bringing two checkers down (13/9, 13/7). This way they cleared the "liability" of the 13pt with minimal risk. White can only hit with 6 rolls next turn, while having only an 1point board and a blot on their own 7 point. Blacks will have many gammonish return shots if being hit, especially if whites hit with 61 or 62.


 
 21: 7/5 6/5 
XGID=------DAE----Baaa-cbcbbC--:1:1:1:21:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-92
1.XG Roller+13/11 8/7eq: -0,966 (+0,004)
Player:
Opponent:
16,80% (G:0,63% B:0,02%)
83,20% (G:32,72% B:1,14%)
2.playedXG Roller+7/5 6/5eq: -0,970
Player:
Opponent:
16,97% (G:0,62% B:0,02%)
83,03% (G:33,47% B:1,16%)
3.4-ply8/7 6/4eq: -0,973 (-0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
17,36% (G:0,91% B:0,02%)
82,64% (G:34,55% B:1,42%)
4.4-ply8/7 8/6eq: -0,982 (-0,012)
Player:
Opponent:
16,48% (G:0,77% B:0,02%)
83,52% (G:33,37% B:1,33%)
5.3-ply8/5eq: -0,954 (+0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
17,43% (G:0,81% B:0,03%)
82,57% (G:32,95% B:1,40%)
 
 21: 10/8 9/8 
XGID=-----BC-E----Baaa-cbcbbC--:1:1:-1:21:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=163-92
1.xgXG Roller++11/9 10/9eq: +0,964
Player:
Opponent:
84,71% (G:29,32% B:0,95%)
15,29% (G:0,46% B:0,02%)
2.XG Roller++11/9 7/6eq: +0,937 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
83,61% (G:29,24% B:1,00%)
16,39% (G:0,63% B:0,03%)
3.XG Roller++11/10 9/7eq: +0,902 (-0,063)
Player:
Opponent:
82,58% (G:28,37% B:0,92%)
17,42% (G:0,65% B:0,02%)
4.playedXG Roller++10/8 9/8eq: +0,883 (-0,081)
Player:
Opponent:
82,45% (G:27,04% B:0,84%)
17,55% (G:0,76% B:0,03%)
5.4-ply11/10 7/5eq: +0,897 (-0,068)
Player:
Opponent:
82,54% (G:28,07% B:1,03%)
17,46% (G:0,99% B:0,04%)

Blacks are so much ahead in the race that blocking whites' sixes can only harm themselves. XG says that they should play the equally safe 11/9, 10/9 which minimizes future contact.
Kostas: "We played it automatically, not even thinked about the other option"


 
 52: 8/3 6/4 
XGID=-----BC-E----Ba--bcbcbbC--:1:1:1:52:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=163-89
1.XG Roller+13/11 8/3eq: -0,892 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
17,85% (G:0,83% B:0,03%)
82,15% (G:28,35% B:0,94%)
2.playedXG Roller+8/3 6/4eq: -0,893
Player:
Opponent:
18,00% (G:0,81% B:0,03%)
82,00% (G:28,90% B:0,98%)
3.XG Roller+8/6 8/3eq: -0,894 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
17,63% (G:0,78% B:0,03%)
82,37% (G:28,16% B:0,91%)
4.XG Roller+13/8 6/4eq: -0,908 (-0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
17,23% (G:0,73% B:0,03%)
82,77% (G:28,50% B:0,95%)
5.4-ply8/3 5/3eq: -0,897 (-0,004)
Player:
Opponent:
17,74% (G:0,87% B:0,01%)
82,26% (G:28,58% B:1,05%)
 
 63: 11/5 7/4 
XGID=---AABB-D----Ba--bcbcbbC--:1:1:-1:63:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=156-89
1.played3-ply11/5 7/4eq: +0,906
Player:
Opponent:
82,32% (G:29,29% B:1,17%)
17,68% (G:0,94% B:0,02%)
2.3-ply11/8 7/1eq: +0,800 (-0,107)
Player:
Opponent:
79,41% (G:26,17% B:0,82%)
20,59% (G:0,93% B:0,01%)
3.3-ply7/4 7/1eq: +0,731 (-0,175)
Player:
Opponent:
75,22% (G:29,87% B:1,27%)
24,78% (G:2,53% B:0,08%)
4.3-ply11/5 8/5eq: +0,719 (-0,188)
Player:
Opponent:
74,71% (G:29,44% B:1,42%)
25,29% (G:2,28% B:0,04%)
5.3-ply8/5 7/1eq: +0,665 (-0,242)
Player:
Opponent:
73,00% (G:29,13% B:1,32%)
27,00% (G:3,31% B:0,10%)
 
 65: 13/7 8/3 
XGID=---AABB-D----B---bbbdcbC--:1:1:1:65:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=156-80
1.played4-ply13/7 8/3eq: -0,893
Player:
Opponent:
17,07% (G:0,99% B:0,02%)
82,93% (G:27,05% B:0,90%)
2.4-ply13/8 13/7eq: -0,921 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
16,03% (G:0,75% B:0,01%)
83,97% (G:27,17% B:0,89%)
3.4-ply8/3 8/2eq: -0,926 (-0,032)
Player:
Opponent:
16,61% (G:0,93% B:0,02%)
83,39% (G:28,76% B:1,13%)
4.4-ply13/2eq: -0,949 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
15,72% (G:0,74% B:0,01%)
84,28% (G:28,83% B:1,09%)
5.3-ply13/7 6/1eq: -1,004 (-0,111)
Player:
Opponent:
14,26% (G:0,46% B:0,03%)
85,74% (G:30,55% B:1,12%)
 
 64: 7/3 7/1 
XGID=---BABBAC----A---bbbdcbC--:1:1:-1:64:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=145-80
1.played3-ply7/3 7/1eq: +0,906
Player:
Opponent:
83,23% (G:27,42% B:0,80%)
16,77% (G:0,73% B:0,01%)
2.1-ply7/1 5/1eq: +0,545 (-0,361)
Player:
Opponent:
69,96% (G:24,26% B:0,80%)
30,04% (G:2,18% B:0,04%)
3.1-ply8/4 7/1eq: +0,261 (-0,645)
Player:
Opponent:
58,98% (G:25,55% B:1,08%)
41,02% (G:6,93% B:0,24%)
 
 41: 13/12 8/4 
XGID=---BABBAC----A---b-bdccCa-:1:1:1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=145-70
1.xg4-ply8/7 8/4eq: -0,892
Player:
Opponent:
18,36% (G:0,85% B:0,01%)
81,64% (G:29,40% B:0,96%)
2.played4-ply13/12 8/4eq: -0,898 (-0,006)
Player:
Opponent:
18,06% (G:0,80% B:0,01%)
81,94% (G:29,39% B:1,02%)
3.4-ply13/9 8/7eq: -0,913 (-0,021)
Player:
Opponent:
17,70% (G:0,76% B:0,01%)
82,30% (G:29,98% B:0,99%)
4.4-ply8/4 7/6eq: -0,917 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
17,26% (G:0,68% B:0,01%)
82,74% (G:29,19% B:1,02%)
5.3-ply13/9 7/6eq: -0,938 (-0,047)
Player:
Opponent:
16,32% (G:0,53% B:0,02%)
83,68% (G:29,33% B:0,83%)
 
 43: 8/5 8/4 
XGID=---BBBBAB---A----b-bdccCa-:1:1:-1:43:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=140-70
1.played3-ply8/5 8/4eq: +1,094
Player:
Opponent:
87,77% (G:33,93% B:1,29%)
12,23% (G:0,02% B:0,00%)
2.1-ply5/1 4/1eq: +0,726 (-0,369)
Player:
Opponent:
77,19% (G:24,42% B:0,60%)
22,81% (G:1,01% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply8/1eq: +0,396 (-0,698)
Player:
Opponent:
64,20% (G:23,85% B:0,84%)
35,80% (G:3,09% B:0,05%)
4.1-ply6/3 5/1eq: +0,246 (-0,849)
Player:
Opponent:
60,68% (G:18,17% B:0,65%)
39,32% (G:4,17% B:0,07%)
5.1-ply8/4 6/3eq: -0,258 (-1,352)
Player:
Opponent:
43,32% (G:16,00% B:0,76%)
56,68% (G:12,87% B:0,56%)
 
 65: 23/18 12/6 
XGID=---BBBBAB---A------bedcCa-:1:1:1:65:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=140-63
1.played4-ply23/18 12/6eq: -1,067
Player:
Opponent:
10,96% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,04% (G:28,61% B:1,26%)
2.4-ply23/12eq: -1,070 (-0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
11,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,98% (G:29,03% B:1,16%)
3.4-ply23/17 12/7eq: -1,072 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
11,43% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,57% (G:29,89% B:1,21%)
4.4-ply23/18 8/2eq: -1,073 (-0,006)
Player:
Opponent:
11,60% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,40% (G:30,37% B:1,46%)
5.3-ply12/6 7/2eq: -1,067 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
12,30% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
87,70% (G:31,66% B:1,14%)
 
 54: 5/Off 4/Off 
XGID=---BBBCAB---------AbedcBa-:1:1:-1:54:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=129-63
1.playedXG Roller++5/Off 4/Offeq: +1,085
Player:
Opponent:
89,74% (G:28,73% B:1,11%)
10,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++5/1 5/Offeq: +1,011 (-0,074)
Player:
Opponent:
87,80% (G:26,53% B:0,89%)
12,20% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply6/1 4/Offeq: +0,522 (-0,562)
Player:
Opponent:
69,62% (G:21,30% B:0,82%)
30,38% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply6/1 5/1eq: +0,439 (-0,645)
Player:
Opponent:
68,12% (G:18,23% B:0,50%)
31,88% (G:1,77% B:0,01%)
 
 64: 18/8 
XGID=---BBBCAB---------AbdccBa-:1:1:1:64:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=129-54
1.4-ply18/14 8/2eq: -1,079 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
10,69% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,31% (G:29,23% B:1,23%)
2.played4-ply18/8eq: -1,080
Player:
Opponent:
10,40% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,60% (G:28,78% B:1,12%)
3.4-ply18/12 8/4eq: -1,085 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
10,24% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,76% (G:28,83% B:1,14%)
4.4-ply8/4 8/2eq: -1,093 (-0,013)
Player:
Opponent:
10,77% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,23% (G:30,55% B:1,34%)
5.3-ply18/12 6/2eq: -1,079 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
11,32% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,68% (G:30,48% B:1,26%)
 
 44: 5/1 4/Off(3) 
XGID=---BBBCAC----------bdccBa-:1:1:-1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=119-54
1.playedXG Roller++5/1 4/Off(3)eq: +1,022
Player:
Opponent:
82,72% (G:38,17% B:1,14%)
17,28% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++5/1(4)eq: +0,776 (-0,246)
Player:
Opponent:
79,19% (G:24,30% B:0,28%)
20,81% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply5/1(3) 4/Offeq: +0,285 (-0,737)
Player:
Opponent:
60,27% (G:20,53% B:0,44%)
39,73% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply5/1(2) 4/Off(2)eq: +0,266 (-0,756)
Player:
Opponent:
58,75% (G:22,10% B:0,61%)
41,25% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

The difference betweem the 5/1 4/off(3) and the alternative of 5/1(4) is huge. Three more checkers off make a big difference impacting both gammons and single wins. In addition, by this play blacks will be much less likely to leave a blot in the next turn.


 
 44: 8/4(3) 7/3 
XGID=---BBBCAC----------bc-cBb-:1:1:1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=119-38
1.xg4-ply8/4(2) 7/3 6/2eq: -1,022
Player:
Opponent:
15,39% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
84,61% (G:34,32% B:1,04%)
2.4-ply8/4(3) 6/2eq: -1,029 (-0,007)
Player:
Opponent:
14,86% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
85,14% (G:33,91% B:1,00%)
3.played4-ply8/4(3) 7/3eq: -1,038 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
13,18% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
86,82% (G:31,14% B:0,86%)
4.4-ply8/4(2) 6/2(2)eq: -1,078 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
14,41% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
85,59% (G:37,27% B:1,12%)
5.3-ply8/4(2) 6/2 5/1eq: -1,106 (-0,084)
Player:
Opponent:
13,71% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
86,29% (G:38,00% B:1,58%)
 
 42: 5/1 3/1 
XGID=---CEBC------------bc-cBb-:1:1:-1:42:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=103-38
1.played4-ply5/1 3/1eq: +0,865
Player:
Opponent:
83,03% (G:23,66% B:0,39%)
16,97% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply6/Offeq: +0,750 (-0,115)
Player:
Opponent:
78,09% (G:23,44% B:0,70%)
21,91% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply5/3 5/1eq: +0,362 (-0,503)
Player:
Opponent:
65,30% (G:16,16% B:0,37%)
34,70% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply6/4 5/1eq: +0,028 (-0,837)
Player:
Opponent:
52,50% (G:13,21% B:0,43%)
47,50% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 44: 6/2(2) 5/1(2) 
XGID=---CEBC------------bb-bBd-:1:1:1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=103-32
1.played4-ply6/2(2) 5/1(2)eq: -1,195
Player:
Opponent:
6,75% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,25% (G:31,87% B:0,49%)
2.4-ply6/2(3) 5/1eq: -1,204 (-0,010)
Player:
Opponent:
6,36% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,64% (G:31,90% B:0,52%)

Kostas: "Before the roll Haris said that if whites roll a 44 again, then he and Kostas would not have anything to worry about. Whites did roll 44 (going down to 6,7% winning rate) so it will be interesting to see what comes next.


 
 62: 6/4 6/Off 
XGID=-BBCE-A------------bb-bBd-:1:1:-1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=87-32
1.played3-ply6/4 6/Offeq: +1,138
Player:
Opponent:
93,24% (G:26,90% B:0,33%)
6,76% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.1-ply6/Off 5/3eq: +0,727 (-0,411)
Player:
Opponent:
79,74% (G:18,59% B:0,19%)
20,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply6/Off 3/1eq: +0,638 (-0,500)
Player:
Opponent:
77,13% (G:15,97% B:0,18%)
22,87% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 32: 23/21* 6/3 
XGID=-BBCE-A-------------babBd-:1:1:1:32:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=87-24
1.playedXG Roller++23/21* 6/3eq: -0,831
Player:
Opponent:
11,22% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,78% (G:8,18% B:0,09%)
2.XG Roller++23/21* 21/18eq: -0,923 (-0,093)
Player:
Opponent:
12,06% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,94% (G:18,01% B:0,57%)
3.3-ply23/21* 4/1eq: -0,933 (-0,102)
Player:
Opponent:
12,86% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,14% (G:20,80% B:0,64%)
4.1-ply4/2 4/1eq: -1,435 (-0,604)
Player:
Opponent:
4,54% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
95,46% (G:48,63% B:1,08%)
5.1-ply6/3 4/2eq: -1,446 (-0,615)
Player:
Opponent:
3,47% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
96,53% (G:47,39% B:0,97%)

Winning the game, although possible, is not top priority for whites here. Minimizing gammon losses is more important and 6/3 better serves that goal.


 
 33: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBDE---------------bAbAd-:1:1:-1:33:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=82-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,694
Player:
Opponent:
84,75% (G:4,37% B:0,06%)
15,25% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 42: 21/15 
XGID=aBBDE---------------bAbAd-:1:1:1:42:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=82-45
1.XG Roller++23/17eq: -0,744 (+0,002)
Player:
Opponent:
13,16% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
86,84% (G:4,41% B:0,05%)
2.playedXG Roller++21/15eq: -0,746
Player:
Opponent:
13,45% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
86,55% (G:5,19% B:0,06%)
3.4-ply21/17 3/1eq: -0,762 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
12,97% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,03% (G:5,78% B:0,05%)
4.4-ply21/17 4/2eq: -0,774 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
12,50% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,50% (G:5,86% B:0,06%)
5.3-ply23/19 3/1eq: -0,760 (-0,013)
Player:
Opponent:
13,29% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
86,71% (G:6,24% B:0,05%)
 
 62: Bar/17 
XGID=aBBDE----------A----b-bAd-:1:1:-1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=76-45
1.played3-plyBar/17eq: +0,851
Player:
Opponent:
91,14% (G:5,20% B:0,05%)
8,86% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.1-plyBar/19 5/3eq: +0,480 (-0,371)
Player:
Opponent:
76,09% (G:3,24% B:0,03%)
23,91% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-plyBar/19 3/1eq: +0,435 (-0,417)
Player:
Opponent:
74,20% (G:3,10% B:0,03%)
25,80% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 52: 15/8*  
XGID=-BBDE---a------A----b-bAd-:1:1:1:52:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=76-37
1.played3-ply15/8* eq: -0,708
Player:
Opponent:
14,41% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
85,59% (G:3,86% B:0,07%)
2.3-ply23/18 3/1eq: -0,903 (-0,195)
Player:
Opponent:
7,70% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
92,30% (G:7,46% B:0,07%)
3.2-ply23/18 4/2eq: -0,901 (-0,193)
Player:
Opponent:
7,86% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
92,14% (G:7,65% B:0,07%)
4.2-ply23/18 15/13eq: -0,927 (-0,218)
Player:
Opponent:
8,24% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,76% (G:10,74% B:0,17%)
5.2-ply23/16eq: -0,936 (-0,228)
Player:
Opponent:
6,28% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,72% (G:7,50% B:0,07%)
 
 41: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBDE---A-----------b-bAd-:1:1:-1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=69-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,516
Player:
Opponent:
78,05% (G:2,19% B:0,04%)
21,95% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 32: 23/18 
XGID=aBBDE---A-----------b-bAd-:1:1:1:32:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=69-45
1.played4-ply23/18eq: -0,613
Player:
Opponent:
18,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
82,00% (G:2,69% B:0,03%)
2.4-ply23/21 4/1eq: -0,637 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
17,07% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
82,93% (G:2,95% B:0,04%)
3.4-ply8/3eq: -0,659 (-0,047)
Player:
Opponent:
15,12% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
84,88% (G:0,87% B:0,01%)
4.4-ply4/2 4/1eq: -0,678 (-0,065)
Player:
Opponent:
15,58% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
84,42% (G:3,53% B:0,05%)
5.3-ply4/1 3/1eq: -0,672 (-0,060)
Player:
Opponent:
15,89% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
84,11% (G:3,70% B:0,07%)
 
 61: Bar/18 
XGID=aBBDE---A---------A-b-b-d-:1:1:-1:61:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=64-45
1.played4-plyBar/18eq: +0,650
Player:
Opponent:
84,32% (G:1,00% B:0,02%)
15,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-plyBar/19 5/4eq: +0,571 (-0,079)
Player:
Opponent:
80,78% (G:1,45% B:0,02%)
19,22% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.3-plyBar/19 3/2eq: +0,560 (-0,090)
Player:
Opponent:
80,54% (G:1,07% B:0,01%)
19,46% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 61: 18/12 8/7*  
XGID=-BBDE--aA---------A-b-b-d-:1:1:1:61:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=64-38
1.played4-ply18/12 8/7* eq: -0,426
Player:
Opponent:
25,72% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
74,28% (G:1,74% B:0,03%)
2.4-ply8/7* 7/1eq: -0,483 (-0,058)
Player:
Opponent:
22,69% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
77,31% (G:0,62% B:0,01%)
3.1-ply8/1eq: -0,780 (-0,355)
Player:
Opponent:
9,84% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
90,16% (G:0,77% B:0,01%)
4.1-ply8/2 4/3eq: -0,784 (-0,358)
Player:
Opponent:
9,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
90,32% (G:0,77% B:0,01%)
5.1-ply8/2 3/2eq: -0,788 (-0,362)
Player:
Opponent:
9,52% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
90,48% (G:0,80% B:0,01%)
 
 31: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBDE--A----A-------b-b-d-:1:1:-1:31:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=57-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,085
Player:
Opponent:
60,11% (G:0,23% B:0,01%)
39,89% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 41: 12/11 7/3 
XGID=aBBDE--A----A-------b-b-d-:1:1:1:41:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=57-45
1.playedXG Roller++12/11 7/3eq: -0,210
Player:
Opponent:
34,10% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
65,90% (G:0,19% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++7/2eq: -0,235 (-0,026)
Player:
Opponent:
33,23% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
66,77% (G:0,28% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply7/3 4/3eq: -0,266 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
32,16% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
67,84% (G:0,32% B:0,00%)
4.3-ply12/8 7/6eq: -0,359 (-0,149)
Player:
Opponent:
29,23% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
70,77% (G:3,14% B:0,07%)
5.2-ply12/8 3/2eq: -0,396 (-0,186)
Player:
Opponent:
26,71% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
73,29% (G:1,21% B:0,01%)

After some unfortunate rolls from Charis&Kostas, and some good from Tanaka&-Michi, the latter pair now has as top priority to win the game and not save the gammon. 12/11 7/3 not only saves a crossover in the critical race that will follow, but also keeps a checker back on the 11 pt so as to provide a better coverage of blacks' blot, in case they enter next turn.


 
 44: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBEE------A--------b-b-d-:1:1:-1:44:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=52-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,079
Player:
Opponent:
52,97% (G:0,09% B:0,00%)
47,03% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 65: 11/Off 
XGID=aBBEE------A--------b-b-d-:1:1:1:65:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=52-45
1.played3-ply11/Offeq: +0,362
Player:
Opponent:
58,80% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
41,20% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 31: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBEE---------------b-b-d-:1:1:-1:31:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=41-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,818
Player:
Opponent:
24,29% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
75,71% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 Double/Take 
XGID=aBBEE---------------b-b-d-:1:1:1:00:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=41-45
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No redouble Redouble/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 75,81% (G:0,00% B:0,00%) 75,97% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 24,19% (G:0,00% B:0,00%) 24,03% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,516 +1,075
Cubeful Equities
     No redouble:+0,741 (-0,081)
played Redouble/Take:+0,821
     Redouble/Pass:+1,000 (+0,179)
 
Best Cube action: Redouble / Take

Now whites are huge favorite to win the game and correctly redouble to 4. If blacks enter (except with 55 or 66) next turn whites will still be the favorite as they will have less crossovers to bear off. If blacks dance, then whites will have lost they market by a lot. Another factor also favoring doubling is the fact that blacks' take is not clear and blacks will probably have to make some kind of calculations which will cost them time and energy or they may just make a mistake.

It is black that has to think of the take and it is a difficult task to do so. According to a classic reference position (also included in Backgammon Encyclopedia of Kit Woolsey) where blacks have 5 checkers off, one checker on the bar and their remaining checkers well placed (e.g. on the 2 and 1 point) and whites have a perfect full board (The three spare checkers on his 6,5 and 4 points) then blacks have around 22% winning chances which give them a marginal take in money games. Here, blacks' spare checkers are not well placed (blacks will probably have some costly wastage during bear off). On the other hand although whites have one checker off, blacks have 6 mens off, which favours blacks compared to the reference position (one white checker off in a full board with excellent distribution would not make a big difference for whites). I would estimate that those two differences sum up to some kind of an improvement for whites (lets assume that it becomes from 22% of the reference position a 20% wins for blacks).

Of course we have not taken into account the already open 6 and 5 points of whites which form a big change, as blacks will be favorite to enter next turn. I think it is obvious that this last difference (although not easy to calculate directly) is more than enough to make it a clear take for money games let alone at this score.

Correct decision by both sides on a difficult position in a clocked match played at around 4 o'clock in the morning after a series of other long matches.

Kostas: "It took them 4 minutes in a clocked match to think about the redouble, so I didn't think it could be a bluff, despite our gaps in our 2 and 4 points. In addition, we noticed that if their next roll had an 1 or 2, they would not take 2 off and that would cost them a lot as the would not improve their crossover number. Haris was not sure if it is a take or not, but decided to gamble and thus we took the cube."

p.s. Some very strong players often decide very fast in similar positions, as they have a very strong "feel" of such positions which come from experience (e.g. performed similar calculations many time in the past, have similar reference positions, or just have much experience in similar positions)


 
 53: 4/Off 3/Off 
XGID=aBBEE---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:1:53:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=41-45
1.played3-ply4/Off 3/Offeq: +0,533
Player:
Opponent:
81,37% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
18,63% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.2-ply4/1 4/Offeq: +0,332 (-0,201)
Player:
Opponent:
72,53% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
27,47% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 32: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBBDD---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:-1:32:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=34-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,795
Player:
Opponent:
8,24% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,76% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

As stated in the previous comment whites would have lost their market by a lot, had they not doubled.


 
 31: 3/2 3/Off 
XGID=aBBDD---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:1:31:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=34-45
1.played4-ply3/2 3/Offeq: +0,717
Player:
Opponent:
88,66% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
11,34% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/Offeq: +0,679 (-0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
87,17% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
12,83% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply4/1 3/2eq: +0,649 (-0,068)
Player:
Opponent:
86,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
13,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.3-ply4/3 4/1eq: +0,614 (-0,102)
Player:
Opponent:
84,64% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
15,36% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.1-ply3/Off 1/Offeq: +0,365 (-0,351)
Player:
Opponent:
75,32% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
24,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 11: Cannot Move 
XGID=aBCBD---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:-1:11:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=30-45
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,899
Player:
Opponent:
4,06% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
95,94% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 62: 4/2 4/Off 
XGID=aBCBD---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:1:62:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=30-45
1.played4-ply4/2 4/Offeq: +0,899
Player:
Opponent:
95,92% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4,08% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/Off 2/Offeq: +0,841 (-0,058)
Player:
Opponent:
93,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
6,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply4/Off 3/1eq: +0,423 (-0,476)
Player:
Opponent:
77,58% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
22,42% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 54: Bar/16 
XGID=aBDBB---------------b-b-d-:2:-1:-1:54:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=24-45
1.played4-plyBar/16eq: -0,898
Player:
Opponent:
4,13% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
95,87% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-plyBar/20 5/1eq: -0,930 (-0,033)
Player:
Opponent:
2,82% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
97,18% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 22: 2/Off(4) 
XGID=-BDBB----a----------b-b-d-:2:-1:1:22:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=24-36
1.played4-ply2/Off(4)eq: +0,960
Player:
Opponent:
98,28% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
1,72% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/Off 2/Off(2)eq: +0,937 (-0,023)
Player:
Opponent:
97,35% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2,65% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply4/Off 3/1 2/Offeq: +0,925 (-0,034)
Player:
Opponent:
96,88% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3,12% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply4/2 4/Off 3/1eq: +0,684 (-0,276)
Player:
Opponent:
87,63% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
12,37% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.4-ply4/2(2) 3/1(2)eq: +0,669 (-0,291)
Player:
Opponent:
86,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
13,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 65: 16/5 
XGID=-B-BB----a----------b-b-d-:2:-1:-1:65:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=16-36
1.played3-ply16/5eq: -0,970
Player:
Opponent:
1,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
98,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 42: 4/2 4/Off 
XGID=-B-BB---------------c-b-d-:2:-1:1:42:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=16-25
1.xg4-ply4/Off 3/1eq: +0,950
Player:
Opponent:
97,76% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2,24% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.played4-ply4/2 4/Offeq: +0,950 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
97,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 21: 5/3 1/Off 
XGID=-BAB----------------c-b-d-:2:-1:-1:21:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=10-25
1.xg4-ply3/Offeq: -0,982
Player:
Opponent:
0,81% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,19% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.played4-ply5/3 1/Offeq: -0,989 (-0,008)
Player:
Opponent:
0,46% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,54% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply5/4 5/3eq: -1,000 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply5/2eq: -1,000 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.1-ply5/4 3/1eq: -1,000 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 42: 3/Off 2/Off 
XGID=-BAB----------------b-c-c-:2:-1:1:42:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=10-22
1.played4-ply3/Off 2/Offeq: +0,989
Player:
Opponent:
99,47% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,53% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply3/1 3/Offeq: +0,989
Player:
Opponent:
99,47% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,53% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 53: 5/2 5/Off 
XGID=-B-A----------------b-c-c-:2:-1:-1:53:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=5-22
1.xg4-ply5/Off 3/Offeq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.played4-ply5/2 5/Offeq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 33: 3/Off 1/Off(2) 
XGID=-B-A------------------cac-:2:-1:1:33:1:0:0:7:10 Pip=5-14
1.played3-ply3/Off 1/Off(2)eq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 Wins a Single Game 4pts. 

Game Summary:

Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
World Champ. (-0,0028) Total Error World Champ. (-0,0036)
World Champ. (-0,0031) Checker Play World Champ. (-0,0044)
World Champ. (+0,0000) Cube Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
1,42 Performance Rating 1,82
1 Move Errors 1(1)
-0,080(-1,07%) Equity lost (cost) -0,102(-1,47%)
     
0 Double Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Take Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
1 Total Error 1(1)
-0,080(-1,07%) Equity lost (cost) -0,102(-1,47%)
     
4 Jokers 2
+1,063(+28,47%) Luck -1,063(-28,47%)

 Game 3

7 point match, Score is Tanaka,Michi: 5, HK: 0

 
 54: 24/20 13/8 
XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:54:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-167
1.xgBook113/9 13/8eq: +0,238
Player:
Opponent:
49,79% (G:14,60% B:0,64%)
50,21% (G:12,79% B:0,61%)
2.playedBook124/20 13/8eq: +0,230 (-0,008)
Player:
Opponent:
50,69% (G:12,84% B:0,53%)
49,31% (G:12,71% B:0,47%)
3.4-ply24/15eq: +0,183 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
50,38% (G:11,74% B:0,49%)
49,62% (G:13,10% B:0,48%)
4.4-ply13/4eq: +0,161 (-0,077)
Player:
Opponent:
48,43% (G:13,47% B:0,68%)
51,57% (G:14,15% B:0,72%)
5.3-ply13/8 6/2eq: +0,095 (-0,143)
Player:
Opponent:
47,09% (G:12,83% B:0,65%)
52,91% (G:15,00% B:0,85%)
 
1 Generated by GameSite 2000, Ltd on 5/21/2011 using eXtreme Gammon 2.00
Analyzed in XG Roller++

Blacks are trailing 7-away 2-away and they need to be alert for gammonish plays and for turning the cube earlier than normal (if they have many gammon wins). According to XG's database 13/9, 13/8 is just slightly better than the standard split.


 
 63: 24/15 
XGID=-a---aE-C---dE---d-e----B-:0:0:1:63:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-158
1.played4-ply24/15eq: -0,394
Player:
Opponent:
45,20% (G:8,55% B:0,28%)
54,80% (G:14,66% B:0,48%)
2.4-ply24/18 8/5* eq: -0,423 (-0,029)
Player:
Opponent:
45,27% (G:10,33% B:0,40%)
54,73% (G:16,35% B:0,72%)
3.4-ply24/21 13/7eq: -0,428 (-0,034)
Player:
Opponent:
44,03% (G:9,65% B:0,33%)
55,97% (G:14,69% B:0,67%)
4.4-ply13/4eq: -0,434 (-0,040)
Player:
Opponent:
44,04% (G:9,94% B:0,32%)
55,96% (G:14,63% B:0,77%)
5.4-ply13/7 8/5* eq: -0,439 (-0,045)
Player:
Opponent:
45,39% (G:11,70% B:0,44%)
54,61% (G:16,55% B:1,19%)

Similarly, whites should avoid gammonish positions and the running play is clearly best.


 
 No double 
XGID=-a---aE-C---dE-A-d-e----A-:0:0:-1:00:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=158-158
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 54,80% (G:14,66% B:0,48%) 54,84% (G:14,91% B:0,48%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 45,20% (G:8,55% B:0,28%) 45,16% (G:8,73% B:0,30%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,107 +0,311
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,394
     Double/Take:+0,308 (-0,087)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,606)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 11,2%
 
 32: 24/22 13/10*  
XGID=-a---aE-C---dE-A-d-e----A-:0:0:-1:32:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=158-158
1.playedXG Roller+24/22 13/10* eq: +0,373
Player:
Opponent:
54,16% (G:14,51% B:0,55%)
45,84% (G:10,28% B:0,41%)
2.XG Roller+13/10* 10/8eq: +0,347 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
53,77% (G:13,92% B:0,49%)
46,23% (G:10,06% B:0,36%)
3.4-ply13/11 13/10* eq: +0,340 (-0,033)
Player:
Opponent:
52,66% (G:15,50% B:0,69%)
47,34% (G:11,54% B:0,54%)
4.4-ply13/10* 8/6eq: +0,316 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
52,28% (G:14,89% B:0,61%)
47,72% (G:11,04% B:0,45%)
5.3-ply20/18 13/10* eq: +0,303 (-0,069)
Player:
Opponent:
53,03% (G:13,67% B:0,63%)
46,97% (G:11,59% B:0,45%)
 
 31: Bar/22 6/5*  
XGID=---a-aE-C---cE-a-d-e----AA:0:0:1:31:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=168-153
1.playedXG Roller+Bar/22 6/5* eq: -0,399
Player:
Opponent:
46,07% (G:11,03% B:0,45%)
53,93% (G:15,96% B:0,74%)
2.XG Roller+Bar/24 6/3* eq: -0,498 (-0,099)
Player:
Opponent:
43,58% (G:9,70% B:0,37%)
56,42% (G:16,33% B:0,77%)
3.XG Roller+Bar/24 8/5* eq: -0,513 (-0,114)
Player:
Opponent:
43,96% (G:10,80% B:0,44%)
56,04% (G:17,16% B:0,98%)
4.XG Roller+Bar/21eq: -0,572 (-0,173)
Player:
Opponent:
41,81% (G:9,21% B:0,37%)
58,19% (G:17,17% B:0,64%)
5.2-plyBar/22 24/23eq: -0,533 (-0,134)
Player:
Opponent:
41,64% (G:8,77% B:0,33%)
58,36% (G:16,92% B:0,57%)

Running didn't work for white's and now they have to play the real game! Hitting with 6/5 is clear.


 
 No double 
XGID=a--a-AD-C---cE-a-d-e--A-A-:0:0:-1:00:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=164-158
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 54,00% (G:16,21% B:0,79%) 54,09% (G:16,11% B:0,75%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 46,00% (G:11,26% B:0,43%) 45,91% (G:11,21% B:0,43%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,065 +0,321
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,390
     Double/Take:+0,318 (-0,073)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,610)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 9,6%
 
 22: Bar/23 22/20* 6/4(2) 
XGID=a--a-AD-C---cE-a-d-e--A-A-:0:0:-1:22:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=164-158
1.played3-plyBar/23 22/20* 6/4(2)eq: +0,782
Player:
Opponent:
60,79% (G:21,46% B:1,33%)
39,21% (G:7,62% B:0,27%)
2.2-plyBar/21 22/20* 10/8eq: +0,474 (-0,307)
Player:
Opponent:
55,93% (G:17,07% B:0,71%)
44,07% (G:9,64% B:0,34%)
3.2-plyBar/23 22/20* 20/16eq: +0,464 (-0,318)
Player:
Opponent:
55,63% (G:16,68% B:0,84%)
44,37% (G:10,71% B:0,41%)
4.2-plyBar/21 22/20* 13/11eq: +0,445 (-0,337)
Player:
Opponent:
54,51% (G:17,56% B:0,92%)
45,49% (G:10,36% B:0,46%)
5.2-plyBar/21 22/20* 8/6eq: +0,432 (-0,349)
Player:
Opponent:
54,04% (G:17,68% B:0,92%)
45,96% (G:10,21% B:0,40%)
 
 43: Bar/22 24/20 
XGID=--a--aD-C---cE-a-d-c-bA-AA:0:0:1:43:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=184-150
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/22 24/20eq: -0,807
Player:
Opponent:
36,95% (G:6,79% B:0,24%)
63,05% (G:18,29% B:0,67%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/22 13/9eq: -0,871 (-0,064)
Player:
Opponent:
37,20% (G:7,11% B:0,26%)
62,80% (G:20,49% B:1,05%)
3.XG Roller++Bar/22 6/2* eq: -0,889 (-0,082)
Player:
Opponent:
36,54% (G:6,87% B:0,23%)
63,46% (G:20,09% B:1,01%)
4.3-plyBar/22 8/4eq: -0,932 (-0,125)
Player:
Opponent:
36,69% (G:7,08% B:0,24%)
63,31% (G:22,10% B:1,07%)
5.2-plyBar/18eq: -1,000 (-0,193)
Player:
Opponent:
36,51% (G:7,05% B:0,31%)
63,49% (G:27,51% B:1,73%)

Tanaka and Michi have rolled a 3 which makes the valuable 22 point. They chose the "quite" 24/20 which minimizes gammons and XG++ agrees.


 
 Double/Take 
XGID=--a--aD-C---cE-a-d-cAbB---:0:0:-1:00:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=177-150
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 63,09% (G:18,00% B:0,68%) 63,35% (G:17,96% B:0,67%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 36,91% (G:6,94% B:0,26%) 36,65% (G:7,09% B:0,29%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,338 +0,807
Cubeful Equities
     No double:+0,754 (-0,049)
played Double/Take:+0,802
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,198)
 
Best Cube action: Double / Take

Charis and Kostas correctly double early (compared to money game) as their gammon rate is getting higher. It would be a blunder to double at money game.


 
 53: 10/5* 8/5 
XGID=--a--aD-C---cE-a-d-cAbB---:1:1:-1:53:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=177-150
1.played3-ply10/5* 8/5eq: +0,646
Player:
Opponent:
68,87% (G:22,32% B:0,80%)
31,13% (G:4,74% B:0,14%)
2.2-ply23/20 10/5* eq: +0,454 (-0,192)
Player:
Opponent:
62,49% (G:17,20% B:0,47%)
37,51% (G:6,08% B:0,14%)
3.2-ply20/15 8/5* eq: +0,424 (-0,222)
Player:
Opponent:
60,45% (G:17,80% B:0,68%)
39,55% (G:8,72% B:0,38%)
4.2-ply20/15 13/10eq: +0,402 (-0,244)
Player:
Opponent:
60,96% (G:15,21% B:0,52%)
39,04% (G:8,05% B:0,28%)
5.2-ply13/5* eq: +0,395 (-0,252)
Player:
Opponent:
58,65% (G:18,43% B:0,65%)
41,35% (G:8,68% B:0,35%)
 
 33: Bar/22 8/5*(3)  
XGID=--a--aD-C---cE---c-cbbB--A:1:1:1:33:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=182-142
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/22 8/5*(3) eq: -0,484
Player:
Opponent:
35,27% (G:7,66% B:0,22%)
64,73% (G:15,74% B:0,57%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/22 13/10(3)eq: -0,487 (-0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
34,12% (G:5,75% B:0,19%)
65,88% (G:14,22% B:0,45%)
3.4-plyBar/22 13/10 8/5*(2) eq: -0,513 (-0,029)
Player:
Opponent:
36,69% (G:8,00% B:0,24%)
63,31% (G:20,31% B:0,85%)
4.4-plyBar/22 13/10(2) 8/5* eq: -0,572 (-0,088)
Player:
Opponent:
35,55% (G:6,96% B:0,23%)
64,45% (G:23,27% B:0,97%)
5.3-plyBar/22 13/10(2) 6/3eq: -0,567 (-0,083)
Player:
Opponent:
33,86% (G:5,46% B:0,20%)
66,14% (G:20,25% B:0,75%)

Gammon wins don't count for Whites and thus the Bar/22 13/10(3) becomes a strong candidate to the obvious Bar/22 8/5*(3).


 
 64: Bar/15 
XGID=a-a--CD-----cE---c-cbbC---:1:1:-1:64:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=170-147
1.played4-plyBar/15eq: +0,503
Player:
Opponent:
66,02% (G:15,20% B:0,55%)
33,98% (G:6,70% B:0,21%)
2.4-plyBar/21 23/17eq: +0,478 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
63,90% (G:16,53% B:0,64%)
36,10% (G:7,84% B:0,25%)
3.4-plyBar/21 8/2eq: +0,460 (-0,043)
Player:
Opponent:
61,86% (G:18,47% B:0,69%)
38,14% (G:8,68% B:0,32%)
4.4-plyBar/21 13/7eq: +0,455 (-0,048)
Player:
Opponent:
61,60% (G:18,37% B:0,74%)
38,40% (G:8,71% B:0,33%)

All the way out is clear again.


 
 31: 13/10* 6/5 
XGID=--a--CD---a-cE---c-cbbC---:1:1:1:31:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=170-137
1.playedXG Roller++13/10* 6/5eq: -0,464 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
36,32% (G:8,42% B:0,24%)
63,68% (G:15,85% B:0,58%)
2.xgXG Roller++13/10* 10/9eq: -0,465
Player:
Opponent:
36,67% (G:8,61% B:0,26%)
63,33% (G:16,41% B:0,62%)
3.3-ply13/10* 5/4eq: -0,572 (-0,108)
Player:
Opponent:
35,49% (G:7,64% B:0,24%)
64,51% (G:23,19% B:0,98%)
4.2-ply6/2* eq: -0,640 (-0,175)
Player:
Opponent:
30,63% (G:5,53% B:0,13%)
69,37% (G:20,96% B:0,76%)
5.2-ply5/2* 2/1eq: -0,688 (-0,223)
Player:
Opponent:
28,31% (G:5,04% B:0,12%)
71,69% (G:21,11% B:0,76%)
 
 51: Bar/24 23/18 
XGID=a-a--DC---A-cD---c-cbbC---:1:1:-1:51:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-147
1.playedXG Roller+Bar/24 23/18eq: +0,447
Player:
Opponent:
63,31% (G:14,98% B:0,56%)
36,69% (G:8,49% B:0,26%)
2.XG Roller+Bar/24 13/8eq: +0,397 (-0,050)
Player:
Opponent:
60,68% (G:15,24% B:0,54%)
39,32% (G:9,20% B:0,29%)
3.3-plyBar/24 6/1eq: +0,345 (-0,101)
Player:
Opponent:
57,32% (G:16,59% B:0,57%)
42,68% (G:11,63% B:0,42%)

Again Blacks correctly choose not to stay back. They need to look for an advanced anchor and better control the outfield.


 
 32: 13/11 10/7*  
XGID=-a---DCa--A-cD---c-cbbC---:1:1:1:32:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-141
1.xgXG Roller++10/7* 7/5eq: -0,475
Player:
Opponent:
35,38% (G:8,35% B:0,22%)
64,62% (G:15,23% B:0,53%)
2.playedXG Roller++13/11 10/7* eq: -0,506 (-0,030)
Player:
Opponent:
36,59% (G:8,87% B:0,28%)
63,41% (G:19,54% B:0,81%)
3.XG Roller++6/3 5/3eq: -0,551 (-0,076)
Player:
Opponent:
33,21% (G:6,62% B:0,22%)
66,79% (G:17,91% B:0,64%)
4.4-ply13/10 5/3eq: -0,566 (-0,090)
Player:
Opponent:
33,09% (G:6,43% B:0,18%)
66,91% (G:18,84% B:0,70%)
5.3-ply10/5eq: -0,563 (-0,087)
Player:
Opponent:
30,39% (G:5,38% B:0,17%)
69,61% (G:14,18% B:0,50%)

Most humans would play the better looking 13/11 10/7* than the ugly 10/7* 7/5 in a money game. Here the score should alerts us for more conservative plays. Tanaka and Michi made a small mistake.

Kostas: "They tried the correct 10/7* 7/5 , which looked strange to me. I could not imagine that a 5th checker on their 5 point could be correct!"


 
 33: Bar/22 24/18* 18/15 
XGID=aa---DCA---AcC---c-cbbC---:1:1:-1:33:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=161-148
1.xgXG Roller++Bar/22 24/18* 13/10eq: +0,765
Player:
Opponent:
70,81% (G:28,38% B:1,37%)
29,19% (G:5,77% B:0,26%)
2.playedXG Roller++Bar/22 24/18* 18/15eq: +0,756 (-0,010)
Player:
Opponent:
72,23% (G:25,61% B:1,06%)
27,77% (G:5,07% B:0,20%)
3.XG Roller++Bar/22 24/18* 8/5eq: +0,742 (-0,024)
Player:
Opponent:
69,97% (G:28,02% B:1,24%)
30,03% (G:5,79% B:0,24%)
4.1-plyBar/22 13/10(3)eq: +0,418 (-0,347)
Player:
Opponent:
60,61% (G:17,00% B:0,68%)
39,39% (G:9,02% B:0,20%)
5.1-plyBar/22 24/21 13/7eq: +0,412 (-0,354)
Player:
Opponent:
59,36% (G:18,40% B:0,81%)
40,64% (G:11,69% B:0,48%)

XG++ agrees with Bill Robertie on the value of conectivity here. By playing Bar/22 24/18* 13/10 Blacks keep their back checker connected and a better coverage of both outer fields. On the down side is that whites have much more return shots.


 
 21: Bar/23 11/10*  
XGID=---a-DC---aAcC---c-cbbC--A:1:1:1:21:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=179-136
1.played3-plyBar/23 11/10* eq: -0,633
Player:
Opponent:
33,39% (G:7,78% B:0,28%)
66,61% (G:24,57% B:1,13%)
2.3-plyBar/24 13/11eq: -0,717 (-0,084)
Player:
Opponent:
28,51% (G:5,17% B:0,19%)
71,49% (G:23,63% B:0,97%)
3.3-plyBar/24 5/3* eq: -0,754 (-0,121)
Player:
Opponent:
31,85% (G:5,99% B:0,24%)
68,15% (G:31,10% B:1,90%)
4.3-plyBar/24 11/9eq: -0,772 (-0,139)
Player:
Opponent:
29,13% (G:4,95% B:0,21%)
70,87% (G:28,76% B:1,44%)
5.2-plyBar/23 5/4eq: -0,831 (-0,198)
Player:
Opponent:
30,73% (G:5,72% B:0,26%)
69,27% (G:35,65% B:2,05%)
 
 66: Cannot Move 
XGID=a--a-DC---A-cC---c-cbbCA--:1:1:-1:66:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=176-146
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,496
Player:
Opponent:
61,87% (G:21,09% B:0,99%)
38,13% (G:10,23% B:0,37%)
 
 62: 10/4 6/4 
XGID=a--a-DC---A-cC---c-cbbCA--:1:1:1:62:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=176-146
1.playedXG Roller+10/4 6/4eq: -0,467
Player:
Opponent:
39,04% (G:11,09% B:0,45%)
60,96% (G:20,25% B:0,95%)
2.XG Roller+22/16 5/3* eq: -0,532 (-0,065)
Player:
Opponent:
38,64% (G:9,70% B:0,38%)
61,36% (G:24,38% B:1,43%)
3.3-ply22/14eq: -0,585 (-0,118)
Player:
Opponent:
35,52% (G:8,50% B:0,35%)
64,48% (G:23,83% B:1,27%)
4.3-ply13/7 5/3* eq: -0,610 (-0,143)
Player:
Opponent:
37,23% (G:10,82% B:0,38%)
62,77% (G:27,98% B:1,84%)
5.3-ply22/16 13/11eq: -0,621 (-0,154)
Player:
Opponent:
34,99% (G:8,54% B:0,36%)
65,01% (G:25,42% B:1,62%)
 
 42: Bar/23 22/18 
XGID=a--aBDB-----cC---c-cbbCA--:1:1:-1:42:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=168-146
1.playedXG Roller+Bar/23 22/18eq: +0,492
Player:
Opponent:
61,38% (G:21,50% B:1,07%)
38,62% (G:11,54% B:0,42%)
2.XG Roller+Bar/23 6/2* eq: +0,472 (-0,021)
Player:
Opponent:
60,01% (G:22,11% B:1,06%)
39,99% (G:12,18% B:0,59%)
3.XG Roller+Bar/23 8/4eq: +0,435 (-0,058)
Player:
Opponent:
58,77% (G:21,14% B:1,00%)
41,23% (G:11,76% B:0,46%)
4.3-plyBar/23 13/9eq: +0,367 (-0,125)
Player:
Opponent:
56,01% (G:20,02% B:1,01%)
43,99% (G:14,61% B:0,65%)
5.1-plyBar/23 5/1eq: +0,059 (-0,434)
Player:
Opponent:
44,79% (G:13,53% B:0,50%)
55,21% (G:21,29% B:1,20%)

Once again not staying back with two checkers is the correct strategy. Charis and Kostas seem to be very concentrated.


 
 42: 13/7*  
XGID=--a-BDBa----cC---c-cbbCA--:1:1:1:42:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=168-140
1.played4-ply13/7* eq: -0,566
Player:
Opponent:
36,96% (G:11,08% B:0,41%)
63,04% (G:24,72% B:1,23%)
2.4-ply22/16eq: -0,598 (-0,032)
Player:
Opponent:
33,77% (G:8,09% B:0,28%)
66,23% (G:22,35% B:0,99%)
3.3-ply22/18 5/3eq: -0,675 (-0,109)
Player:
Opponent:
34,12% (G:7,71% B:0,35%)
65,88% (G:28,87% B:1,50%)
4.2-ply22/18 13/11eq: -0,763 (-0,197)
Player:
Opponent:
30,70% (G:6,50% B:0,24%)
69,30% (G:30,22% B:1,70%)
5.2-ply13/9 5/3eq: -0,819 (-0,254)
Player:
Opponent:
30,83% (G:7,20% B:0,31%)
69,17% (G:34,71% B:2,09%)
 
 54: Cannot Move 
XGID=a-a-BDBA----cB---c-cbbCA--:1:1:-1:54:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=162-147
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,322
Player:
Opponent:
54,46% (G:18,83% B:0,96%)
45,54% (G:16,72% B:0,60%)
 
 41: 22/18 7/6 
XGID=a-a-BDBA----cB---c-cbbCA--:1:1:1:41:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=162-147
1.playedXG Roller+22/18 7/6eq: -0,367
Player:
Opponent:
43,48% (G:14,69% B:0,66%)
56,52% (G:19,29% B:0,94%)
2.XG Roller+7/2* eq: -0,431 (-0,063)
Player:
Opponent:
42,14% (G:14,99% B:0,55%)
57,86% (G:22,06% B:1,20%)
3.3-ply22/18 5/4eq: -0,491 (-0,124)
Player:
Opponent:
40,45% (G:12,86% B:0,54%)
59,55% (G:24,11% B:1,35%)
4.3-ply23/18eq: -0,494 (-0,127)
Player:
Opponent:
39,15% (G:11,83% B:0,45%)
60,85% (G:22,57% B:1,07%)
5.2-ply13/9 7/6eq: -0,582 (-0,215)
Player:
Opponent:
36,13% (G:12,58% B:0,47%)
63,87% (G:24,63% B:1,27%)

Hitting  cannot be correct here. Whites do not have many covering numbers and they are shot of ammunition to further continue the attack. In addition, while black is on the bar, the timming is changing and 4 checkers stuck behind blacks' prime may prove disastrous. Finally, by playing 22/18 whites will have descent chances to make the valuable 18 point. It is more of a priming game than a blitz one.


 
 31: Bar/22 8/7*  
XGID=a-a-BDC-----cB---cAcbbBA--:1:1:-1:31:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=157-147
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/22 8/7* eq: +0,478
Player:
Opponent:
60,25% (G:21,95% B:1,19%)
39,75% (G:13,85% B:0,80%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/22 23/22eq: +0,434 (-0,043)
Player:
Opponent:
60,66% (G:18,37% B:0,69%)
39,34% (G:10,05% B:0,36%)
3.2-plyBar/24 8/5eq: +0,335 (-0,143)
Player:
Opponent:
54,99% (G:19,12% B:0,91%)
45,01% (G:15,05% B:0,61%)
4.2-plyBar/22 6/5eq: +0,318 (-0,160)
Player:
Opponent:
54,62% (G:18,41% B:0,85%)
45,38% (G:15,48% B:0,56%)
5.2-plyBar/24 13/10eq: +0,265 (-0,213)
Player:
Opponent:
52,35% (G:17,68% B:0,87%)
47,65% (G:17,99% B:1,01%)

According to XG++ making the 22 point is slightly better for money games (by 0,012), however Charis and Kostas seem to really know what they are doing and they played the correct at this score Bar/22 8/7*. So far they have made all the necessary "adjustments" that the score dictates.


 
 62: Bar/23 22/16 
XGID=--aaBDC-----cB---bacbbBA-A:1:1:1:62:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=164-143
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/23 22/16eq: -0,754
Player:
Opponent:
29,13% (G:8,69% B:0,40%)
70,87% (G:26,64% B:1,71%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/23 13/7eq: -0,891 (-0,137)
Player:
Opponent:
25,76% (G:6,45% B:0,35%)
74,24% (G:32,21% B:2,05%)

Difficult position as both plays give up a significant asset for whites. The key here is to understand that a 3-2 backgame losses many gammons (more than a 23 point anchor game) and more importantly a 3-2 backgame needs a lot of timming. Whites do not have enough timming to play a 3-2 backgame and they correctly chose to keep their 13 point and play 22/16 with the six.


 
 63: 13/7 6/3*  
XGID=--aaBDC-----cB--AbacbbAB--:1:1:-1:63:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=156-143
1.played3-ply13/7 6/3* eq: +0,841
Player:
Opponent:
73,94% (G:28,47% B:1,91%)
26,06% (G:8,39% B:0,42%)
2.2-ply13/10 13/7eq: +0,579 (-0,261)
Player:
Opponent:
64,65% (G:22,52% B:1,52%)
35,35% (G:12,79% B:0,82%)
3.2-ply23/17 6/3* eq: +0,535 (-0,305)
Player:
Opponent:
61,90% (G:23,55% B:1,49%)
38,10% (G:17,30% B:1,47%)
4.1-ply22/16 6/3* eq: +0,499 (-0,341)
Player:
Opponent:
60,27% (G:22,99% B:1,63%)
39,73% (G:17,85% B:1,40%)
5.1-ply22/16 7/4eq: +0,437 (-0,404)
Player:
Opponent:
58,97% (G:20,26% B:1,36%)
41,03% (G:13,85% B:0,48%)
 
 44: Cannot Move 
XGID=--aaBDC-----bB--AbbbbbaB-A:1:1:1:44:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=159-134
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,003
Player:
Opponent:
22,03% (G:5,22% B:0,26%)
77,97% (G:34,93% B:2,33%)
 
 42: 13/11 13/9*  
XGID=--aaBDC-----bB--AbbbbbaB-A:1:1:-1:42:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=159-134
1.playedXG Roller+13/11 13/9* eq: +1,129
Player:
Opponent:
81,55% (G:39,05% B:2,76%)
18,45% (G:4,09% B:0,29%)
2.XG Roller+13/9* 9/7eq: +1,088 (-0,041)
Player:
Opponent:
80,16% (G:37,88% B:2,74%)
19,84% (G:4,67% B:0,27%)
3.XG Roller+13/9* 3/1eq: +1,018 (-0,111)
Player:
Opponent:
78,69% (G:35,32% B:2,20%)
21,31% (G:5,37% B:0,35%)
4.XG Roller+7/5 7/3eq: +0,870 (-0,260)
Player:
Opponent:
73,07% (G:31,90% B:2,30%)
26,93% (G:6,19% B:0,26%)
5.2-ply22/16eq: +0,863 (-0,266)
Player:
Opponent:
75,04% (G:28,89% B:1,72%)
24,96% (G:7,67% B:0,43%)
 
 62: Bar/23 
XGID=--aaBDC------Ba-abbbbbaB-B:1:1:1:62:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=168-128
1.played3-plyBar/23eq: -1,219
Player:
Opponent:
15,23% (G:2,34% B:0,11%)
84,77% (G:41,63% B:2,55%)
 
 65: 23/18 9/3 
XGID=--aaBDC------Ba-abbbbbaC-A:1:1:-1:65:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-128
1.xgXG Roller++22/17 9/3eq: +1,332
Player:
Opponent:
88,08% (G:45,58% B:2,67%)
11,92% (G:0,61% B:0,03%)
2.playedXG Roller++23/18 9/3eq: +1,332 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
88,83% (G:44,73% B:2,39%)
11,17% (G:0,57% B:0,03%)
3.XG Roller++11/6 9/3eq: +1,272 (-0,060)
Player:
Opponent:
84,97% (G:45,17% B:2,98%)
15,03% (G:1,58% B:0,06%)
4.3-ply23/17 22/17eq: +1,186 (-0,147)
Player:
Opponent:
85,25% (G:38,44% B:2,22%)
14,75% (G:2,63% B:0,11%)
5.2-ply23/17 8/3eq: +1,073 (-0,259)
Player:
Opponent:
79,00% (G:38,49% B:2,79%)
21,00% (G:4,36% B:0,32%)
 
 55: Cannot Move 
XGID=---aBDCa-----Ba--bbbbbbC-A:1:1:1:55:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-117
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,271
Player:
Opponent:
14,15% (G:0,90% B:0,02%)
85,85% (G:44,12% B:2,65%)
 
 65: 22/16 11/6 
XGID=---aBDCa-----Ba--bbbbbbC-A:1:1:-1:65:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-117
1.playedXG Roller++22/16 11/6eq: +1,267 (+0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
86,30% (G:43,69% B:2,28%)
13,70% (G:0,66% B:0,03%)
2.XG Roller++22/17 11/5eq: +1,261 (+0,009)
Player:
Opponent:
85,97% (G:43,72% B:2,29%)
14,03% (G:0,71% B:0,04%)
3.XG Roller++22/11eq: +1,254 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
86,22% (G:42,99% B:2,11%)
13,78% (G:0,60% B:0,03%)
4.xgXG Roller++22/16 18/13eq: +1,253
Player:
Opponent:
85,92% (G:43,37% B:2,12%)
14,08% (G:0,55% B:0,03%)
5.XG Roller++18/13 11/5eq: +1,243 (-0,010)
Player:
Opponent:
85,19% (G:43,38% B:2,33%)
14,81% (G:0,74% B:0,04%)

Kostas and Charis are correctly staying behind whites' 13 point looking to hit more checkers given the opportunity (e.g. after whites' 61 or 62).


 
 61: Bar/24 13/7*  
XGID=----BDCa-a---B---bbcbbbC-A:1:1:1:61:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=166-106
1.played3-plyBar/24 13/7* eq: -1,371
Player:
Opponent:
12,39% (G:0,90% B:0,03%)
87,61% (G:47,77% B:3,76%)
 
 61: Bar/18*  
XGID=a---BDCA-a---A---bbcbbbCA-:1:1:-1:61:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=159-113
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/18* eq: +1,489
Player:
Opponent:
84,92% (G:57,29% B:6,80%)
15,08% (G:0,51% B:0,03%)
2.2-plyBar/24 16/10eq: +1,197 (-0,293)
Player:
Opponent:
84,44% (G:40,60% B:2,36%)
15,56% (G:1,23% B:0,05%)
3.1-plyBar/24 7/1* eq: +1,026 (-0,463)
Player:
Opponent:
71,66% (G:45,16% B:3,93%)
28,34% (G:7,35% B:0,43%)

The dice rewards the greek players' clever strategy. XG++ gives a gammon rate of 57,3% for Blacks


 
 32: Bar/23 13/10 
XGID=----BDCa-a---A---bbcbbbCAA:1:1:1:32:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=177-106
1.played4-plyBar/23 13/10eq: -1,565
Player:
Opponent:
12,46% (G:0,32% B:0,01%)
87,54% (G:61,65% B:5,56%)
2.4-plyBar/23 5/2eq: -1,621 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
12,43% (G:0,37% B:0,01%)
87,57% (G:64,56% B:6,63%)
3.4-plyBar/23 6/3eq: -1,626 (-0,061)
Player:
Opponent:
12,65% (G:0,37% B:0,01%)
87,35% (G:64,76% B:6,94%)
4.3-plyBar/23 4/1eq: -1,669 (-0,104)
Player:
Opponent:
12,17% (G:0,40% B:0,02%)
87,83% (G:66,67% B:7,50%)
 
 55: 16/1* 6/1 
XGID=----BDCa-aA------bbcbbbDA-:1:1:-1:55:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=172-106
1.playedXG Roller++16/1* 6/1eq: +1,472 (+0,014)
Player:
Opponent:
82,43% (G:63,29% B:5,16%)
17,57% (G:0,68% B:0,03%)
2.xgXG Roller++18/3 6/1* eq: +1,458
Player:
Opponent:
84,83% (G:59,64% B:4,18%)
15,17% (G:0,75% B:0,03%)
3.XG Roller++18/13 16/1* eq: +1,438 (-0,020)
Player:
Opponent:
85,44% (G:58,44% B:3,29%)
14,56% (G:0,50% B:0,02%)
4.XG Roller++18/8 16/11 6/1* eq: +1,432 (-0,026)
Player:
Opponent:
85,33% (G:58,01% B:3,37%)
14,67% (G:0,55% B:0,02%)
5.XG Roller++18/3 16/11eq: +1,415 (-0,043)
Player:
Opponent:
84,85% (G:57,61% B:3,24%)
15,15% (G:0,61% B:0,03%)
 
 54: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDCa--A------bbbbbbDbA:1:1:1:54:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-86
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,534
Player:
Opponent:
17,22% (G:0,48% B:0,01%)
82,78% (G:66,23% B:6,15%)
 
 62: 18/10 
XGID=----BDCa--A------bbbbbbDbA:1:1:-1:62:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-86
1.xgXG Roller++7/5 7/1eq: +1,439
Player:
Opponent:
80,47% (G:63,14% B:5,50%)
19,53% (G:0,77% B:0,03%)
2.playedXG Roller++18/10eq: +1,392 (-0,047)
Player:
Opponent:
81,24% (G:61,17% B:3,64%)
18,76% (G:0,68% B:0,02%)
3.XG Roller++18/12 7/5eq: +1,391 (-0,048)
Player:
Opponent:
81,25% (G:60,60% B:3,89%)
18,75% (G:0,78% B:0,03%)
4.XG Roller++18/16 7/1eq: +1,367 (-0,072)
Player:
Opponent:
79,15% (G:60,81% B:4,62%)
20,85% (G:1,26% B:0,04%)
5.XG Roller++18/12 8/6eq: +1,360 (-0,078)
Player:
Opponent:
80,45% (G:59,92% B:3,56%)
19,55% (G:0,85% B:0,03%)

Here XG prefers staying back at the cost of breaking the 7point. Hitting this last checker not only increases the gammon for Blacks but also the backgammons (with value of 1,63)!

The most difficult part with this play is to think of it in a clocked match that most moves are being played in "auto-pilot mode".

Kostas: "We couldn't imagine that the prospect of hitting a second checker could increase our gammons and backgammons by 2%"


 
 54: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDC---A----a-bbbbbbDbA:1:1:1:54:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-78
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,461
Player:
Opponent:
17,94% (G:0,49% B:0,00%)
82,06% (G:64,09% B:4,57%)
 
 54: 10/5 8/4 
XGID=----BDC---A----a-bbbbbbDbA:1:1:-1:54:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-78
1.xgXG Roller++8/4 8/3eq: +1,483
Player:
Opponent:
82,44% (G:65,74% B:4,35%)
17,56% (G:0,39% B:0,01%)
2.playedXG Roller++10/5 8/4eq: +1,422 (-0,060)
Player:
Opponent:
80,91% (G:63,10% B:4,36%)
19,09% (G:0,70% B:0,02%)
3.XG Roller++10/5 7/3eq: +1,412 (-0,071)
Player:
Opponent:
80,61% (G:62,85% B:4,28%)
19,39% (G:0,82% B:0,02%)
4.XG Roller++10/6 8/3eq: +1,402 (-0,081)
Player:
Opponent:
80,38% (G:62,83% B:4,02%)
19,62% (G:0,84% B:0,03%)
5.XG Roller++8/3 7/3eq: +1,394 (-0,089)
Player:
Opponent:
79,83% (G:62,99% B:4,08%)
20,17% (G:1,58% B:0,06%)

Clearing the 8 point is better here. Maybe Kostas and Charis prefered to make the play that does not give a direct shot to White's (provided that whites do not enter) after 66 next turn.


 
 11: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDC---A------abbccbDbA:1:1:1:11:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-69
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,527
Player:
Opponent:
17,42% (G:0,39% B:0,01%)
82,58% (G:67,70% B:5,28%)
 
 43: 8/5 7/3 
XGID=----BDC---A------abbccbDbA:1:1:-1:43:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-69
1.playedXG Roller+8/5 7/3eq: +1,548
Player:
Opponent:
83,10% (G:68,16% B:5,57%)
16,90% (G:0,27% B:0,01%)
2.XG Roller+7/4 7/3eq: +1,502 (-0,047)
Player:
Opponent:
81,88% (G:66,26% B:5,52%)
18,12% (G:0,31% B:0,01%)
3.XG Roller+8/4 7/4eq: +1,494 (-0,055)
Player:
Opponent:
81,90% (G:66,70% B:4,90%)
18,10% (G:0,30% B:0,01%)
4.XG Roller+8/1eq: +1,389 (-0,159)
Player:
Opponent:
79,09% (G:64,45% B:3,85%)
20,91% (G:0,89% B:0,03%)
5.XG Roller+7/3 4/1eq: +1,379 (-0,169)
Player:
Opponent:
78,75% (G:63,93% B:3,96%)
21,25% (G:1,10% B:0,03%)

Again an excellent play from the greek players that did not chose the seemingly safe 8/1.

Giving two shots is totally worth it, in order to avoid future ugly plays that will include a 5 (Note that after 8/1 if whites enter and blacks roll a 65, whites will have a double direct shot). In addition the faster blacks bear in, the higher their gammon and backgammon rate will be!


 
 44: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDC---A-------abdccDbA:1:1:1:44:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-62
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,646
Player:
Opponent:
15,07% (G:0,05% B:0,00%)
84,93% (G:72,13% B:6,27%)
 
 21: 7/4 
XGID=----BDC---A-------abdccDbA:1:1:-1:21:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-62
1.playedXG Roller++7/4eq: +1,644
Player:
Opponent:
85,61% (G:71,60% B:5,89%)
14,39% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++7/6 5/3eq: +1,636 (-0,008)
Player:
Opponent:
85,30% (G:71,90% B:5,66%)
14,70% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.XG Roller++7/5 4/3eq: +1,589 (-0,055)
Player:
Opponent:
84,41% (G:70,30% B:5,12%)
15,59% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply7/6 3/1eq: +1,566 (-0,079)
Player:
Opponent:
82,90% (G:69,35% B:5,89%)
17,10% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply5/3 4/3eq: +1,549 (-0,095)
Player:
Opponent:
83,10% (G:69,28% B:4,98%)
16,90% (G:0,55% B:0,01%)
 
 65: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDC---A--------bddcDbA:1:1:1:65:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-59
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,676
Player:
Opponent:
14,52% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
85,48% (G:72,59% B:6,92%)
 
 32: 6/4 6/3 
XGID=----BDC---A--------bddcDbA:1:1:-1:32:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-59
1.played4-ply6/4 6/3eq: +1,707
Player:
Opponent:
88,06% (G:73,66% B:5,39%)
11,94% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply5/Offeq: +1,653 (-0,053)
Player:
Opponent:
85,20% (G:71,62% B:6,64%)
14,80% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.3-ply5/3 4/1eq: +1,606 (-0,101)
Player:
Opponent:
84,07% (G:71,66% B:5,44%)
15,93% (G:0,04% B:0,00%)
4.2-ply4/1 3/1eq: +1,513 (-0,194)
Player:
Opponent:
81,57% (G:69,54% B:4,57%)
18,43% (G:0,15% B:0,02%)
5.1-ply6/3 5/3eq: +1,242 (-0,464)
Player:
Opponent:
74,68% (G:59,01% B:3,92%)
25,32% (G:1,98% B:0,04%)
 
 31: Cannot Move 
XGID=----BDC---A---------dedDbA:1:1:1:31:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-54
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -1,764
Player:
Opponent:
11,97% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,03% (G:75,94% B:6,90%)
 
 21: 3/Off 
XGID=----BDC---A---------dedDbA:1:1:-1:21:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-54
1.playedXG Roller++3/Offeq: +1,713
Player:
Opponent:
87,02% (G:74,13% B:6,47%)
12,98% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++5/3 4/3eq: +1,699 (-0,014)
Player:
Opponent:
87,63% (G:74,75% B:4,92%)
12,37% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.XG Roller++4/1eq: +1,694 (-0,019)
Player:
Opponent:
87,13% (G:74,36% B:5,35%)
12,87% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.XG Roller++5/4 5/3eq: +1,687 (-0,027)
Player:
Opponent:
87,36% (G:74,22% B:4,87%)
12,64% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply5/4 3/1eq: +1,610 (-0,104)
Player:
Opponent:
84,93% (G:71,82% B:4,75%)
15,07% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

Charis and Kostas chose the aggressive (and correct) play that wins more backgammons!


 
 42: Bar/19 
XGID=----BDC---A---------decDbA:1:1:1:42:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=173-51
1.played4-plyBar/19eq: -1,685
Player:
Opponent:
12,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,26% (G:73,66% B:5,11%)
2.4-plyBar/23 10/6eq: -1,720 (-0,035)
Player:
Opponent:
12,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,74% (G:73,86% B:6,20%)
3.4-plyBar/23 6/2eq: -1,722 (-0,037)
Player:
Opponent:
12,69% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,31% (G:74,28% B:6,46%)
4.4-plyBar/23 5/1eq: -1,739 (-0,054)
Player:
Opponent:
12,18% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,82% (G:74,78% B:6,51%)
 
 62: 5/3 5/Off 
XGID=----BDC---A--------AdecDb-:1:1:-1:62:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-51
1.played3-ply5/3 5/Offeq: +1,706
Player:
Opponent:
88,55% (G:74,28% B:4,59%)
11,45% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.2-ply5/Off 3/1eq: +1,500 (-0,206)
Player:
Opponent:
82,71% (G:68,13% B:3,67%)
17,29% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 41: 23/18 
XGID=----BDC---A--------AbedDb-:1:1:1:41:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=167-44
1.4-ply19/15 5/4eq: -1,702 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
12,05% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
87,95% (G:74,77% B:4,69%)
2.played4-ply23/18eq: -1,703
Player:
Opponent:
11,64% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,36% (G:74,98% B:4,27%)
3.4-ply19/14eq: -1,706 (-0,002)
Player:
Opponent:
11,82% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,18% (G:74,87% B:4,60%)
4.4-ply23/19 10/9eq: -1,719 (-0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
11,94% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
88,06% (G:75,94% B:4,76%)
5.3-ply23/19 5/4eq: -1,755 (-0,052)
Player:
Opponent:
10,55% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,45% (G:76,33% B:4,94%)
 
 42: 5/3 5/1 
XGID=----BDC---A-------AAbedCb-:1:1:-1:42:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=162-44
1.played4-ply5/3 5/1eq: +1,737
Player:
Opponent:
89,49% (G:77,02% B:3,74%)
10,51% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/Off 3/1eq: +1,660 (-0,077)
Player:
Opponent:
87,16% (G:74,46% B:3,65%)
12,84% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.1-ply5/3 4/Offeq: +1,337 (-0,401)
Player:
Opponent:
77,69% (G:62,45% B:3,71%)
22,31% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply5/1 3/1eq: +1,174 (-0,564)
Player:
Opponent:
73,60% (G:58,01% B:2,26%)
26,40% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

Excellent opportunity to clear the 5 point.


 
 51: 23/17 
XGID=----BDC---A-------AA-eeCc-:1:1:1:51:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=162-38
1.xg4-ply19/13eq: -1,734
Player:
Opponent:
10,40% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,60% (G:77,87% B:3,02%)
2.played4-ply23/17eq: -1,734 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
10,34% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,66% (G:78,09% B:2,87%)
3.4-ply23/18 5/4eq: -1,738 (-0,004)
Player:
Opponent:
10,29% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,71% (G:77,98% B:3,04%)
4.4-ply19/14 5/4eq: -1,743 (-0,009)
Player:
Opponent:
10,19% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,81% (G:78,13% B:3,09%)
5.3-ply19/14 4/3eq: -1,750 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
10,58% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
89,42% (G:77,98% B:3,86%)
 
 51: 4/Off 1/Off 
XGID=----BDC---A------AAA-eeBc-:1:1:-1:51:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=156-38
1.played3-ply4/Off 1/Offeq: +1,847
Player:
Opponent:
92,50% (G:80,79% B:4,07%)
7,50% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.3-ply4/3 4/Offeq: +1,758 (-0,090)
Player:
Opponent:
91,02% (G:77,64% B:2,93%)
8,98% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 63: 19/13 10/7 
XGID=----BDC---A------AAA-deBb-:1:1:1:63:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=156-33
1.4-ply17/11 10/7eq: -1,815 (+0,002)
Player:
Opponent:
8,32% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,68% (G:80,17% B:3,65%)
2.xg4-ply17/11 6/3eq: -1,817
Player:
Opponent:
8,33% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,67% (G:80,17% B:3,77%)
3.played4-ply19/13 10/7eq: -1,818 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
8,33% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,67% (G:80,32% B:3,73%)
4.4-ply19/13 6/3eq: -1,819 (-0,002)
Player:
Opponent:
8,30% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,70% (G:80,29% B:3,76%)
5.4-ply19/13 17/14eq: -1,824 (-0,007)
Player:
Opponent:
8,06% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
91,94% (G:80,29% B:3,76%)
 
 41: 4/3 4/Off 
XGID=----BDCA-----A---AA--deBb-:1:1:-1:41:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=147-33
1.playedXG Roller++4/3 4/Offeq: +1,874 (+0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
93,48% (G:84,10% B:2,66%)
6,52% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.xgXG Roller++4/Off 1/Offeq: +1,836
Player:
Opponent:
90,85% (G:81,77% B:4,55%)
9,15% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

Blacks correctly did not chose the "backgammonish" play of taking 2 checkers off. They probably understood that leaving 3 checkers on the 4 point would cost them many single wins and gammons. An additional bonus with this play is that 22 do not leave a blot next turn.


 
 32: 6/3 5/3 
XGID=----BDCA-----A---AA--bfBb-:1:1:1:32:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=147-28
1.played4-ply6/3 5/3eq: -1,902
Player:
Opponent:
6,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,26% (G:84,21% B:4,10%)
2.4-ply7/4 5/3eq: -1,907 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
6,54% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,46% (G:84,16% B:4,17%)
3.4-ply18/15 5/3eq: -1,912 (-0,011)
Player:
Opponent:
6,46% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,54% (G:84,40% B:4,24%)
4.4-ply17/14 5/3eq: -1,912 (-0,011)
Player:
Opponent:
6,48% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,52% (G:84,34% B:4,29%)
5.3-ply13/10 5/3eq: -1,879 (+0,023)
Player:
Opponent:
6,97% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
93,03% (G:83,38% B:3,68%)
 
 66: 4/Off(2) 3/Off(2) 
XGID=---BBCBA-----A---AA--bfBb-:1:1:-1:66:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=142-28
1.played3-ply4/Off(2) 3/Off(2)eq: +2,199
Player:
Opponent:
98,50% (G:94,83% B:7,47%)
1,50% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 51: 23/17 
XGID=---BBCBA-----A---AA---dBb-:1:1:1:51:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=142-14
1.xg4-ply23/18 5/4eq: -2,164
Player:
Opponent:
1,08% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
98,92% (G:96,10% B:4,82%)
2.4-ply23/18 13/12eq: -2,169 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
0,70% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,30% (G:97,45% B:3,96%)
3.4-ply23/18 17/16eq: -2,169 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
0,69% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,31% (G:97,53% B:3,92%)
4.played4-ply23/17eq: -2,173 (-0,009)
Player:
Opponent:
0,62% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,38% (G:97,97% B:3,82%)
5.3-ply23/18 7/6eq: -2,172 (-0,008)
Player:
Opponent:
0,62% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,38% (G:97,95% B:3,79%)
 
 41: 3/Off 1/Off 
XGID=---BBCBA-----A---BA---dAb-:1:1:-1:41:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=136-14
1.played3-ply3/Off 1/Offeq: +2,142
Player:
Opponent:
98,16% (G:95,45% B:4,81%)
1,84% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.1-ply3/2* 3/Offeq: +1,567 (-0,574)
Player:
Opponent:
86,46% (G:72,02% B:1,27%)
13,54% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 11: 17/16 5/2 
XGID=---BBCBA-----A---BA---cAa-:1:1:1:11:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=136-10
1.XG Roller++18/15 17/16eq: -2,151 (+0,002)
Player:
Opponent:
5,70% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
94,30% (G:85,51% B:14,09%)
2.XG Roller++17/14 5/4eq: -2,152 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
5,71% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
94,29% (G:85,54% B:14,12%)
3.xgXG Roller++17/16 17/15 5/4eq: -2,153
Player:
Opponent:
5,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
94,32% (G:85,60% B:14,10%)
4.XG Roller++17/16 13/11 5/4eq: -2,161 (-0,008)
Player:
Opponent:
5,57% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
94,43% (G:85,84% B:14,24%)
5.playedXG Roller++17/16 5/2eq: -2,169 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
5,64% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
94,36% (G:86,28% B:14,46%)

Whites needed a play that would benefit most if they hit next turn. They should have tried to maximize the numbers that make the 7 point and not create a liability (5/2) at the time they could get a hit.


 
 51: 3/Off 1/Off 
XGID=--ABBBBA-----A--AAA---cAa-:1:1:-1:51:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=132-10
1.played3-ply3/Off 1/Offeq: +2,279
Player:
Opponent:
99,93% (G:98,84% B:7,77%)
0,07% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.1-ply3/2* 3/Offeq: +0,510 (-1,769)
Player:
Opponent:
47,95% (G:35,82% B:6,84%)
52,05% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 43: 23/16 
XGID=--ABBBBA-----A--AAA---bA--:1:1:1:43:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=132-6
1.played4-ply23/16eq: -2,126
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:100,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply17/13 16/13eq: -3,227 (-1,101)
Player:
Opponent:
0,62% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,38% (G:91,37% B:56,29%)
3.1-ply23/19 18/15eq: -3,141 (-1,015)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:99,98% B:47,22%)
4.1-ply23/19 17/14eq: -3,141 (-1,015)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:99,98% B:47,22%)
5.1-ply23/19 16/13eq: -3,141 (-1,015)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:99,98% B:47,22%)
 
 43: 3/Off(2) 
XGID=--ABBBBA-----A--BAA---b---:1:1:-1:43:5:0:0:7:10 Pip=125-6
1.played3-ply3/Off(2)eq: +2,126
Player:
Opponent:
100,00% (G:100,00% B:0,00%)
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 Wins a Gammon 4pts. 

Game Summary:

Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
World Champ. (-0,0027) Total Error World Champ. (-0,0020)
World Champ. (-0,0028) Checker Play World Champ. (-0,0022)
World Champ. (+0,0000) Cube Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
1,35 Performance Rating 0,98
1 Move Errors 2
-0,057(-0,73%) Equity lost (cost) -0,059(-0,69%)
     
0 Double Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Take Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
1 Total Error 2
-0,057(-0,73%) Equity lost (cost) -0,059(-0,69%)
     
0 Jokers 1
-2,307(-24,81%) Luck +2,307(+24,81%)

 Game 4

7 point match, Score is Tanaka,Michi: 5, HK: 4

 
 62: 24/18 13/11 
XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:62:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=167-167
1.played4-ply24/18 13/11eq: +0,179
Player:
Opponent:
50,82% (G:12,58% B:0,60%)
49,18% (G:13,33% B:0,53%)
2.4-ply24/16eq: +0,145 (-0,034)
Player:
Opponent:
50,34% (G:11,78% B:0,49%)
49,66% (G:13,55% B:0,50%)
3.4-ply13/5eq: +0,141 (-0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
49,10% (G:13,79% B:0,63%)
50,90% (G:13,73% B:0,71%)
4.3-ply13/11 13/7eq: +0,084 (-0,095)
Player:
Opponent:
48,25% (G:13,65% B:0,73%)
51,75% (G:14,62% B:0,93%)
5.3-ply24/22 24/18eq: +0,075 (-0,104)
Player:
Opponent:
48,96% (G:11,37% B:0,54%)
51,04% (G:14,15% B:0,45%)

Again blacks should strive for complicated positions with higher than normal gammon rates and turn the cube when they think their gammon rate becomes significant.


 
 61: 13/7* 8/7 
XGID=-a----EaC---dEa--c-e----B-:0:0:1:61:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=167-159
1.played3-ply13/7* 8/7eq: -0,021
Player:
Opponent:
52,60% (G:14,72% B:0,64%)
47,40% (G:11,75% B:0,53%)
2.2-ply24/23 13/7* eq: -0,200 (-0,179)
Player:
Opponent:
48,78% (G:13,00% B:0,56%)
51,22% (G:13,51% B:0,67%)
3.2-ply13/7* 7/6eq: -0,222 (-0,201)
Player:
Opponent:
48,28% (G:13,09% B:0,63%)
51,72% (G:13,75% B:0,66%)
4.2-ply24/18 8/7* eq: -0,250 (-0,230)
Player:
Opponent:
48,01% (G:11,65% B:0,51%)
51,99% (G:14,30% B:0,73%)
5.2-ply13/7* 6/5eq: -0,320 (-0,300)
Player:
Opponent:
47,00% (G:11,97% B:0,48%)
53,00% (G:16,04% B:1,25%)
 
 No double 
XGID=aa----EBB---dDa--c-e----B-:0:0:-1:00:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=160-166
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 47,36% (G:11,72% B:0,55%) 47,40% (G:11,75% B:0,53%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 52,64% (G:14,59% B:0,63%) 52,60% (G:14,77% B:0,68%)
  Cubeless Equities -0,163 -0,125
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,020
     Double/Take:-0,124 (-0,145)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,980)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 11,4%
 
 33: Bar/22 11/5 8/5 
XGID=aa----EBB---dDa--c-e----B-:0:0:-1:33:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=160-166
1.played3-plyBar/22 11/5 8/5eq: +0,346
Player:
Opponent:
53,49% (G:15,86% B:0,79%)
46,51% (G:12,21% B:0,44%)
2.3-plyBar/22 13/10 6/3(2)eq: +0,226 (-0,120)
Player:
Opponent:
51,00% (G:15,14% B:0,89%)
49,00% (G:14,17% B:0,71%)
3.3-plyBar/22 8/5(3)eq: +0,190 (-0,156)
Player:
Opponent:
50,22% (G:15,23% B:0,76%)
49,78% (G:13,80% B:0,62%)
4.3-plyBar/22 24/21 6/3(2)eq: +0,183 (-0,164)
Player:
Opponent:
50,71% (G:13,85% B:0,79%)
49,29% (G:14,20% B:0,59%)
5.2-plyBar/22 13/10 8/5(2)eq: +0,137 (-0,209)
Player:
Opponent:
49,01% (G:15,10% B:0,84%)
50,99% (G:15,36% B:0,88%)
 
 43: 7/3* 6/3 
XGID=-a-a--EBB---dD---b-eb---B-:0:0:1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=160-154
1.played3-ply7/3* 6/3eq: -0,464
Player:
Opponent:
44,65% (G:13,77% B:0,57%)
55,35% (G:16,98% B:1,06%)
2.3-ply13/9 6/3* eq: -0,581 (-0,117)
Player:
Opponent:
43,45% (G:11,51% B:0,51%)
56,55% (G:19,99% B:1,67%)
3.2-ply13/6eq: -0,619 (-0,155)
Player:
Opponent:
41,62% (G:10,39% B:0,36%)
58,38% (G:17,62% B:0,87%)
4.2-ply24/21 6/2eq: -0,722 (-0,258)
Player:
Opponent:
41,52% (G:10,21% B:0,45%)
58,48% (G:21,44% B:1,14%)
5.2-ply24/21 13/9eq: -0,737 (-0,272)
Player:
Opponent:
41,02% (G:10,17% B:0,53%)
58,98% (G:20,94% B:1,20%)
 
 No double 
XGID=aa-B--DAB---dD---b-eb---B-:0:0:-1:00:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=153-157
Analyzed in 4-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 55,35% (G:17,22% B:1,06%) 55,36% (G:17,13% B:1,05%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 44,65% (G:13,71% B:0,56%) 44,64% (G:13,60% B:0,54%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,105 +0,444
Cubeful Equities
played No double:+0,470
     Double/Take:+0,443 (-0,026)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,530)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 4,5%
 
 55: Bar/10 13/8 
XGID=aa-B--DAB---dD---b-eb---B-:0:0:-1:55:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=153-157
1.played4-plyBar/10 13/8eq: +0,650
Player:
Opponent:
59,15% (G:16,54% B:1,06%)
40,85% (G:10,48% B:0,32%)
2.4-plyBar/5eq: +0,611 (-0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
58,70% (G:15,94% B:0,99%)
41,30% (G:10,71% B:0,29%)
3.3-plyBar/15 8/3(2)eq: +0,534 (-0,116)
Player:
Opponent:
56,48% (G:17,62% B:1,12%)
43,52% (G:12,86% B:0,42%)
4.3-plyBar/20 13/3 8/3eq: +0,503 (-0,147)
Player:
Opponent:
54,46% (G:19,98% B:1,65%)
45,54% (G:14,89% B:0,68%)
5.2-plyBar/15 13/8(2)eq: +0,407 (-0,243)
Player:
Opponent:
54,87% (G:15,79% B:0,89%)
45,13% (G:13,54% B:0,48%)
 
 No double 
XGID=-a-B--DAB---cD-a-c-eb---B-:0:0:1:00:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=153-137
Analyzed in 2-ply No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances:40,79% (G:10,41% B:0,32%)
  Opponent Winning Chances:59,21% (G:16,29% B:1,02%)
  Cubeless Equities -0,234 -0,628
Cubeful Equities
played No double:-0,642
     Double/Take:-1,733 (-1,092)
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+1,642)
 
Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 28,5%

Kostas: "They looked to have trouble in deciding which point to make. I think that most players would bet that the 5 point is best by far."


 
 32: 8/5 7/5 
XGID=-a-B--DAB---cD-a-c-eb---B-:0:0:1:32:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=153-137
1.xgXG Roller++7/4 6/4eq: -0,701
Player:
Opponent:
39,57% (G:9,91% B:0,29%)
60,43% (G:16,35% B:1,06%)
2.playedXG Roller++8/5 7/5eq: -0,710 (-0,010)
Player:
Opponent:
39,23% (G:10,42% B:0,29%)
60,77% (G:16,14% B:1,02%)
3.2-ply13/10 7/5eq: -0,991 (-0,290)
Player:
Opponent:
36,06% (G:8,76% B:0,31%)
63,94% (G:20,45% B:1,80%)
4.2-ply13/8eq: -1,000 (-0,299)
Player:
Opponent:
34,40% (G:7,80% B:0,24%)
65,60% (G:19,19% B:1,33%)
5.2-ply6/1* eq: -1,000 (-0,299)
Player:
Opponent:
34,56% (G:8,54% B:0,24%)
65,44% (G:20,50% B:1,75%)
 
 Double/Take 
XGID=-a-B-BD-A---cD-a-c-eb---B-:0:0:-1:00:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=148-137
Analyzed in XG Roller++ No double Double/Take
  Player Winning Chances: 60,81% (G:16,16% B:0,96%) 60,75% (G:16,21% B:0,98%)
  Opponent Winning Chances: 39,19% (G:10,61% B:0,32%) 39,25% (G:10,70% B:0,33%)
  Cubeless Equities +0,259 +0,711
Cubeful Equities
     No double:+0,699 (-0,012)
played Double/Take:+0,711
     Double/Pass:+1,000 (+0,289)
 
Best Cube action: Double / Take

Once again, the greek players have an excellent feeling of the score and double on time!


 
 66: 24/18 13/7(3) 
XGID=-a-B-BD-A---cD-a-c-eb---B-:1:1:-1:66:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=148-137
1.played3-ply24/18 13/7(3)eq: +0,430
Player:
Opponent:
63,35% (G:17,12% B:1,17%)
36,65% (G:8,77% B:0,22%)
2.3-ply13/7(3) 10/4eq: +0,316 (-0,114)
Player:
Opponent:
56,83% (G:18,78% B:1,49%)
43,17% (G:12,06% B:0,42%)
3.2-ply13/7(3) 8/2eq: +0,234 (-0,197)
Player:
Opponent:
53,48% (G:17,19% B:1,20%)
46,52% (G:12,79% B:0,55%)
4.2-ply24/18 13/7(2) 8/2eq: +0,199 (-0,231)
Player:
Opponent:
52,63% (G:15,32% B:1,13%)
47,37% (G:18,90% B:1,36%)
5.2-ply24/18 8/2(3)eq: +0,161 (-0,269)
Player:
Opponent:
51,34% (G:14,10% B:0,92%)
48,66% (G:14,44% B:0,48%)

Blacks are way ahead and correctly play 24/18 with their last 6.


 
 62: 13/7* 7/5 
XGID=---B-BDaA----D-a-cceb---B-:1:1:1:62:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=148-113
1.xgXG Roller++24/22 13/7* eq: -0,328
Player:
Opponent:
42,77% (G:12,29% B:0,44%)
57,23% (G:19,25% B:1,38%)
2.XG Roller++13/11 13/7* eq: -0,346 (-0,018)
Player:
Opponent:
41,52% (G:11,27% B:0,32%)
58,48% (G:18,52% B:1,76%)
3.playedXG Roller++13/7* 7/5eq: -0,365 (-0,036)
Player:
Opponent:
39,62% (G:10,80% B:0,26%)
60,38% (G:16,44% B:1,18%)
4.XG Roller++13/7* 6/4eq: -0,391 (-0,062)
Player:
Opponent:
41,13% (G:9,94% B:0,30%)
58,87% (G:22,33% B:2,55%)
5.3-ply13/7* 8/6eq: -0,459 (-0,131)
Player:
Opponent:
34,98% (G:8,33% B:0,22%)
65,02% (G:16,65% B:1,06%)

Difficult play for Tanaka and Michi especially at this score. They preferred the play that loses less gammons probably due to the score implications, but XG++ disagrees. Having a better board (3 point vs 2 points) and with your opponent on the bar and no direct shots you should feel more comfortable with splitting 24/22 or even bringing one more builder with 13/11.


 
 63: Cannot Move 
XGID=a--B-CD-A----C-a-cceb---B-:1:1:-1:63:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=140-120
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: +0,141
Player:
Opponent:
50,89% (G:12,90% B:0,71%)
49,11% (G:15,66% B:0,44%)
 
 53: 24/21 13/8 
XGID=a--B-CD-A----C-a-cceb---B-:1:1:1:53:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=140-120
1.playedXG Roller++24/21 13/8eq: -0,129
Player:
Opponent:
50,56% (G:17,21% B:0,67%)
49,44% (G:14,67% B:0,79%)
2.XG Roller++24/16eq: -0,132 (-0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
50,52% (G:14,08% B:0,36%)
49,48% (G:14,87% B:0,82%)
3.3-ply24/21 8/3eq: -0,260 (-0,132)
Player:
Opponent:
44,77% (G:14,66% B:0,49%)
55,23% (G:16,33% B:0,81%)
4.3-ply13/10 13/8eq: -0,299 (-0,170)
Player:
Opponent:
41,83% (G:12,37% B:0,39%)
58,17% (G:14,24% B:0,90%)
5.2-ply13/8 6/3eq: -0,348 (-0,219)
Player:
Opponent:
39,91% (G:11,29% B:0,25%)
60,09% (G:15,31% B:0,97%)
 
 62: Bar/23 10/4*  
XGID=a--B-CD-B----B-a-ccebA--A-:1:1:-1:62:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=132-120
1.played3-plyBar/23 10/4* eq: +0,224
Player:
Opponent:
53,18% (G:16,83% B:0,88%)
46,82% (G:15,06% B:0,46%)
2.2-plyBar/23 7/1* eq: -0,027 (-0,251)
Player:
Opponent:
42,43% (G:13,07% B:0,42%)
57,57% (G:18,61% B:0,83%)
3.1-plyBar/23 8/2eq: -0,115 (-0,339)
Player:
Opponent:
39,29% (G:10,40% B:0,62%)
60,71% (G:23,74% B:1,21%)
 
 31: Bar/21*  
XGID=--aB-CD-B----B---cceba--AA:1:1:1:31:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=136-112
1.played3-plyBar/21* eq: +0,009
Player:
Opponent:
56,21% (G:20,45% B:0,76%)
43,79% (G:12,10% B:0,61%)
2.1-plyBar/24 5/2* eq: -0,390 (-0,399)
Player:
Opponent:
38,64% (G:11,51% B:0,39%)
61,36% (G:17,06% B:1,20%)
3.1-plyBar/24 13/10eq: -0,527 (-0,536)
Player:
Opponent:
32,47% (G:7,72% B:0,25%)
67,53% (G:18,46% B:1,21%)
4.1-plyBar/24 6/3eq: -0,579 (-0,588)
Player:
Opponent:
30,02% (G:7,14% B:0,21%)
69,98% (G:18,81% B:0,93%)
5.1-plyBar/22 13/12eq: -0,581 (-0,589)
Player:
Opponent:
33,52% (G:8,56% B:0,47%)
66,48% (G:26,30% B:1,96%)
 
 66: Cannot Move 
XGID=a-aB-CD-B----B---ccebA--A-:1:1:-1:66:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=132-133
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,284
Player:
Opponent:
32,18% (G:7,58% B:0,42%)
67,82% (G:28,85% B:0,82%)

Critical dancing roll for black. Now white is the clear favorite.


 
 41: 8/4 5/4 
XGID=a-aB-CD-B----B---ccebA--A-:1:1:1:41:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=132-133
1.played4-ply8/4 5/4eq: +0,164
Player:
Opponent:
63,05% (G:27,22% B:1,00%)
36,95% (G:10,16% B:0,62%)
2.4-ply24/23 6/2* eq: +0,120 (-0,044)
Player:
Opponent:
61,39% (G:25,77% B:0,67%)
38,61% (G:11,27% B:0,64%)
3.4-ply13/12 6/2* eq: +0,102 (-0,062)
Player:
Opponent:
61,05% (G:27,20% B:0,71%)
38,95% (G:12,48% B:1,17%)
4.3-ply8/7 6/2* eq: +0,101 (-0,063)
Player:
Opponent:
61,42% (G:28,76% B:0,73%)
38,58% (G:13,34% B:1,22%)
5.3-ply6/2* 2/1eq: +0,100 (-0,064)
Player:
Opponent:
60,46% (G:26,41% B:0,60%)
39,54% (G:11,47% B:0,62%)
 
 62: Bar/17*  
XGID=a-aBBBD-A----B---ccebA--A-:1:1:-1:62:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=127-133
1.played3-plyBar/17* eq: +0,215
Player:
Opponent:
53,11% (G:16,04% B:1,04%)
46,89% (G:17,17% B:0,61%)
2.1-plyBar/23 7/1* eq: -0,117 (-0,333)
Player:
Opponent:
39,00% (G:10,74% B:0,45%)
61,00% (G:16,57% B:0,63%)
3.1-plyBar/23 8/2eq: -0,175 (-0,390)
Player:
Opponent:
37,18% (G:8,56% B:0,42%)
62,82% (G:17,36% B:0,74%)

Great roll from blacks! It is a game for strong nerves!


 
 65: Cannot Move 
XGID=--aBBBD-a----B---ccebA--AA:1:1:1:65:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=144-125
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,653
Player:
Opponent:
30,56% (G:8,88% B:0,42%)
69,44% (G:27,67% B:1,77%)
 
 55: 8/3(2) 6/1*(2)  
XGID=--aBBBD-a----B---ccebA--AA:1:1:-1:55:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=144-125
1.XG Roller++23/13 6/1*(2) eq: +0,819 (+0,023)
Player:
Opponent:
76,72% (G:29,84% B:1,03%)
23,28% (G:3,47% B:0,15%)
2.playedXG Roller++8/3(2) 6/1*(2) eq: +0,796
Player:
Opponent:
69,75% (G:42,03% B:1,62%)
30,25% (G:7,88% B:0,48%)
3.XG Roller++7/2(2) 6/1*(2) eq: +0,777 (-0,019)
Player:
Opponent:
69,23% (G:41,13% B:1,52%)
30,77% (G:8,58% B:0,50%)
4.2-ply23/18 8/3 6/1*(2) eq: +0,516 (-0,280)
Player:
Opponent:
62,28% (G:28,33% B:1,00%)
37,72% (G:12,67% B:0,73%)
5.2-ply23/18 6/1*(3) eq: +0,516 (-0,281)
Player:
Opponent:
63,74% (G:25,22% B:0,70%)
36,26% (G:7,99% B:0,34%)

Good roll for Kostas and Charis! They have two great choises here. Either they go all in for the gammon to win the match with 8/3(2) 6/1*(2) or they can chose the middle play of 23/13 6/1*(2). The greek players played the aggressive one, but XG++ prefers the second. The risk now for blacks is the last checker being trapped behind whites' 4 point prime.


 
 43: Bar/21 
XGID=--aBBBD-a----B---accbAb-bB:1:1:1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=145-105
1.played3-plyBar/21eq: -0,357
Player:
Opponent:
39,95% (G:7,43% B:0,26%)
60,05% (G:16,34% B:0,21%)

Whites roll a crucial 4 to make the 21 point!

Kostas: "Indeed Michi congratulated Tanaka for rolling this 4 which decreased our gammon from 42% to 16%!"


 
 11: 17/16 8/5 
XGID=--aBBBD-a----B---accbBb-bA:1:1:-1:11:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-105
1.XG Roller++17/14 8/7eq: +0,211 (+0,020)
Player:
Opponent:
54,00% (G:13,73% B:0,17%)
46,00% (G:9,81% B:0,31%)
2.playedXG Roller++17/16 8/5eq: +0,194 (+0,003)
Player:
Opponent:
52,83% (G:14,35% B:0,18%)
47,17% (G:10,39% B:0,35%)
3.xgXG Roller++8/5 7/6eq: +0,191
Player:
Opponent:
52,31% (G:15,12% B:0,19%)
47,69% (G:11,09% B:0,39%)
4.XG Roller++17/15 8/6eq: +0,173 (-0,017)
Player:
Opponent:
52,31% (G:13,33% B:0,18%)
47,69% (G:10,73% B:0,35%)
5.XG Roller++17/14 7/6eq: +0,173 (-0,017)
Player:
Opponent:
51,74% (G:14,49% B:0,20%)
48,26% (G:12,14% B:0,62%)

This is a desperate roll for blacks as they cannot do much with the two back checkers! XG slightly prefers 17/14 8/7 over 17/16 8/5, utilizing two more pips in the task of bringing the two back checkers to safety, while whites are on the bar.


 
 65: Cannot Move 
XGID=--aBBBD--a---B----cccBb-bA:1:1:1:65:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-101
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,454
Player:
Opponent:
35,70% (G:6,57% B:0,24%)
64,30% (G:17,66% B:0,15%)
 
 52: 23/16 
XGID=--aBBBD--a---B----cccBb-bA:1:1:-1:52:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-101
1.played3-ply23/16eq: +0,547
Player:
Opponent:
69,15% (G:17,21% B:0,13%)
30,85% (G:4,85% B:0,13%)
2.3-ply23/18 16/14eq: +0,464 (-0,083)
Player:
Opponent:
64,96% (G:17,29% B:0,17%)
35,04% (G:6,67% B:0,25%)
3.3-ply23/18 7/5eq: +0,413 (-0,135)
Player:
Opponent:
62,14% (G:17,81% B:0,21%)
37,86% (G:7,88% B:0,31%)
4.2-ply23/18 5/3eq: +0,365 (-0,183)
Player:
Opponent:
60,21% (G:16,80% B:0,23%)
39,79% (G:8,71% B:0,33%)
5.2-ply16/11 7/5eq: +0,339 (-0,208)
Player:
Opponent:
58,54% (G:17,61% B:0,20%)
41,46% (G:5,94% B:0,18%)
 
 31: Cannot Move 
XGID=---BBBD--b---B----cccBb-bA:1:1:1:31:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-94
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,669
Player:
Opponent:
26,72% (G:3,84% B:0,13%)
73,28% (G:21,28% B:0,13%)
 
 61: 16/9 
XGID=---BBBD--b---B----cccBb-bA:1:1:-1:61:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-94
1.XG Roller++16/15 16/10eq: +0,538 (+0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
68,83% (G:16,86% B:0,18%)
31,17% (G:5,46% B:0,17%)
2.xgXG Roller++16/10 7/6eq: +0,537
Player:
Opponent:
68,03% (G:18,43% B:0,19%)
31,97% (G:5,56% B:0,19%)
3.playedXG Roller++16/9eq: +0,521 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
67,76% (G:17,31% B:0,16%)
32,24% (G:5,62% B:0,18%)
4.4-ply16/10 6/5eq: +0,482 (-0,055)
Player:
Opponent:
65,82% (G:17,31% B:0,18%)
34,18% (G:6,42% B:0,20%)
5.3-ply7/1 6/5eq: +0,453 (-0,084)
Player:
Opponent:
63,81% (G:18,48% B:0,13%)
36,19% (G:6,95% B:0,26%)

Blacks here preferred the duplication play, where XG++ the connectivity. Note that both play leave 8 shots which explains why XG++ play is slightly better.

Kostas: "We disagreed on this position after having counted the same number of hitting-back rolls. I preferred the 16/15 as the checker on the 10 point gives us a good 44 next turn, which otherwise has to be played badly. Finally, Haris who was sitting, decided to go with 16/9"


 
 54: Bar/16*  
XGID=---BBBD--a---B--a-cccBb-bA:1:1:1:54:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=141-87
1.played3-plyBar/16* eq: +0,380
Player:
Opponent:
72,16% (G:21,94% B:0,66%)
27,84% (G:6,64% B:0,15%)
2.1-plyBar/21 6/1eq: -0,631 (-1,011)
Player:
Opponent:
22,94% (G:1,80% B:0,04%)
77,06% (G:9,37% B:0,06%)
3.1-plyBar/21 13/8eq: -0,731 (-1,110)
Player:
Opponent:
20,91% (G:1,92% B:0,07%)
79,09% (G:15,58% B:0,13%)

Mr Joker is here!


 
 65: Cannot Move 
XGID=a--BBBD--a---B--A-cccBb-b-:1:1:-1:65:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=132-103
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,516
Player:
Opponent:
21,84% (G:4,95% B:0,11%)
78,16% (G:25,77% B:0,72%)
 
 33: 13/7(2) 
XGID=a--BBBD--a---B--A-cccBb-b-:1:1:1:33:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=132-103
1.played3-ply13/7(2)eq: +0,473
Player:
Opponent:
76,06% (G:23,33% B:0,74%)
23,94% (G:5,05% B:0,08%)
2.3-ply16/4eq: +0,361 (-0,112)
Player:
Opponent:
71,26% (G:23,83% B:0,72%)
28,74% (G:6,70% B:0,14%)
3.3-ply16/7 6/3eq: +0,361 (-0,112)
Player:
Opponent:
71,34% (G:23,44% B:0,67%)
28,66% (G:6,88% B:0,14%)
4.3-ply16/10 13/10 6/3eq: +0,319 (-0,154)
Player:
Opponent:
69,39% (G:21,50% B:0,65%)
30,61% (G:7,18% B:0,15%)
5.3-ply13/4 6/3eq: +0,319 (-0,154)
Player:
Opponent:
69,71% (G:24,71% B:0,72%)
30,29% (G:7,92% B:0,18%)
 
 42: Bar/23 7/3 
XGID=a--BBBDB-a------A-cccBb-b-:1:1:-1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=120-103
1.playedXG Roller++Bar/23 7/3eq: -0,403
Player:
Opponent:
27,15% (G:5,67% B:0,09%)
72,85% (G:20,26% B:0,62%)
2.XG Roller++Bar/23 6/2eq: -0,415 (-0,012)
Player:
Opponent:
26,22% (G:6,32% B:0,10%)
73,78% (G:23,65% B:0,76%)
3.XG Roller++Bar/23 5/1eq: -0,438 (-0,035)
Player:
Opponent:
25,61% (G:5,24% B:0,07%)
74,39% (G:23,83% B:0,69%)
4.XG Roller++Bar/23 16/12eq: -0,491 (-0,088)
Player:
Opponent:
23,38% (G:4,38% B:0,08%)
76,62% (G:21,78% B:0,59%)

Blacks have entered with a 2 which gives them an opportunity to escape with a six next turn. In order to have that opportunity they need to minimize white's hitting numbers first, so staying on the 16 point, 7 pips away of white's lone checker is obviously correct here.


 
 11: 16/15 6/5 3/2*(2)  
XGID=--aBBBDB-a------A-bccBc-b-:1:1:1:11:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=120-97
1.playedXG Roller+16/15 6/5 3/2*(2) eq: +0,424
Player:
Opponent:
73,46% (G:21,83% B:0,62%)
26,54% (G:4,73% B:0,08%)
2.XG Roller+6/4 3/2*(2) eq: +0,412 (-0,012)
Player:
Opponent:
72,93% (G:22,47% B:0,70%)
27,07% (G:4,86% B:0,09%)
3.XG Roller+6/2* eq: +0,361 (-0,063)
Player:
Opponent:
72,82% (G:19,73% B:0,72%)
27,18% (G:10,03% B:0,13%)
4.4-ply16/14 3/2*(2) eq: +0,341 (-0,083)
Player:
Opponent:
69,84% (G:20,60% B:0,61%)
30,16% (G:5,86% B:0,11%)
5.3-ply6/5(2) 3/2*(2) eq: +0,332 (-0,092)
Player:
Opponent:
69,35% (G:19,76% B:0,63%)
30,65% (G:5,74% B:0,10%)

Excellent play by Tanaka and Michi here! They correctly hit with 3/2*(2), then played the obvious 6/5 to improve their distribution and lastly they brought the 16 checker on the 15 point in a direct position against blacks' checker. It is a great opportunity, while blacks are on the bar against a 4 point board, to maximize your chances to hit a second checker at the cost of blacks' 3 hitting number (16 and 33. Note that with 36 blacks will make the strategic 16 point with bar/16)


 
 44: Cannot Move 
XGID=a-B-BCCB-a-----A--bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:44:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=116-99
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,610
Player:
Opponent:
17,81% (G:3,59% B:0,08%)
82,19% (G:29,22% B:0,84%)
 
 51: 15/9*  
XGID=a-B-BCCB-a-----A--bccBc-b-:1:1:1:51:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=116-99
1.played3-ply15/9* eq: +0,722
Player:
Opponent:
87,14% (G:34,28% B:0,96%)
12,86% (G:2,19% B:0,04%)
2.2-ply21/15eq: +0,401 (-0,321)
Player:
Opponent:
72,94% (G:24,19% B:0,99%)
27,06% (G:6,05% B:0,09%)
3.2-ply15/10 5/4eq: +0,368 (-0,354)
Player:
Opponent:
71,01% (G:20,47% B:0,66%)
28,99% (G:5,49% B:0,08%)
4.1-ply21/16 15/14eq: +0,343 (-0,379)
Player:
Opponent:
71,92% (G:23,28% B:0,87%)
28,08% (G:9,97% B:0,32%)
5.1-ply15/10 6/5eq: +0,333 (-0,389)
Player:
Opponent:
69,43% (G:19,24% B:0,72%)
30,57% (G:5,79% B:0,09%)

Their clever play with double aces is rewarded.


 
 53: Bar/22 
XGID=b-B-BCCB-A--------bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:53:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=110-108
1.played3-plyBar/22eq: -0,721
Player:
Opponent:
12,89% (G:2,25% B:0,07%)
87,11% (G:34,45% B:0,82%)
 
 42: 7/3* 5/3 
XGID=a-BaBCCB-A--------bccBc-b-:1:1:1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=110-105
1.played3-ply7/3* 5/3eq: +0,823
Player:
Opponent:
91,67% (G:39,95% B:1,04%)
8,33% (G:1,09% B:0,03%)
2.2-ply9/3* eq: +0,618 (-0,205)
Player:
Opponent:
82,66% (G:31,77% B:0,82%)
17,34% (G:3,66% B:0,09%)
3.2-ply21/17 5/3* eq: +0,550 (-0,273)
Player:
Opponent:
81,21% (G:32,02% B:0,97%)
18,79% (G:7,81% B:0,55%)
4.2-ply7/3* 6/4eq: +0,481 (-0,342)
Player:
Opponent:
77,93% (G:32,83% B:0,84%)
22,07% (G:8,17% B:0,28%)
5.1-ply6/2 5/3* eq: +0,488 (-0,335)
Player:
Opponent:
77,43% (G:27,92% B:0,86%)
22,57% (G:6,36% B:0,17%)
 
 21: Bar/24 
XGID=b-BBBBCA-A--------bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:21:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=104-108
1.played3-plyBar/24eq: -0,781
Player:
Opponent:
10,17% (G:1,60% B:0,08%)
89,83% (G:34,26% B:0,88%)
 
 54: 9/5 6/1*  
XGID=aaBBBBCA-A--------bccBc-b-:1:1:1:54:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=104-107
1.xgXG Roller++21/17 21/16eq: +0,777
Player:
Opponent:
89,76% (G:27,81% B:0,62%)
10,24% (G:1,93% B:0,10%)
2.XG Roller++21/17 6/1* eq: +0,758 (-0,019)
Player:
Opponent:
89,86% (G:41,28% B:1,00%)
10,14% (G:4,09% B:0,38%)
3.playedXG Roller++9/5 6/1* eq: +0,738 (-0,038)
Player:
Opponent:
88,14% (G:40,45% B:0,85%)
11,86% (G:2,56% B:0,07%)
4.4-ply21/16 7/3eq: +0,721 (-0,056)
Player:
Opponent:
87,18% (G:33,29% B:1,04%)
12,82% (G:2,38% B:0,12%)
5.3-ply21/17 7/2eq: +0,708 (-0,069)
Player:
Opponent:
86,64% (G:31,58% B:1,07%)
13,36% (G:2,56% B:0,07%)

XG++ prefers the quite play of 21/17 21/16 which leaves the fewer return hits and also loses the fewer gammons. At this score one should at least consider such a play. Another interesting play is the middling play of hitting on the ace and splitting from the back.


 
 41: Bar/24*  
XGID=bABBBCBA----------bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:41:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=95-108
1.played3-plyBar/24* eq: -0,516
Player:
Opponent:
21,32% (G:6,08% B:0,17%)
78,68% (G:26,83% B:0,83%)

Blacks are still alive!


 
 54: Bar/16 
XGID=aaBBBCBA----------bccBc-bA:1:1:1:54:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=119-107
1.played3-plyBar/16eq: +0,663
Player:
Opponent:
84,65% (G:29,45% B:1,01%)
15,35% (G:3,18% B:0,07%)
2.3-plyBar/21 7/2eq: +0,542 (-0,121)
Player:
Opponent:
78,99% (G:26,22% B:0,84%)
21,01% (G:3,96% B:0,06%)
3.1-plyBar/21 6/1* eq: -0,110 (-0,773)
Player:
Opponent:
54,76% (G:17,06% B:0,50%)
45,24% (G:21,54% B:1,17%)
 
 43: Cannot Move 
XGID=aaBBBCBA--------A-bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=110-107
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,741
Player:
Opponent:
11,85% (G:2,25% B:0,07%)
88,15% (G:32,75% B:0,98%)
 
 31: 5/1*  
XGID=aaBBBCBA--------A-bccBc-b-:1:1:1:31:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=110-107
1.played4-ply5/1* eq: +0,734
Player:
Opponent:
88,49% (G:40,37% B:0,90%)
11,51% (G:3,73% B:0,15%)
2.4-ply16/13 5/4eq: +0,708 (-0,026)
Player:
Opponent:
86,78% (G:31,14% B:0,82%)
13,22% (G:2,92% B:0,10%)
3.4-ply16/13 7/6eq: +0,707 (-0,028)
Player:
Opponent:
86,38% (G:32,10% B:0,90%)
13,62% (G:2,19% B:0,07%)
4.4-ply16/12eq: +0,705 (-0,030)
Player:
Opponent:
86,51% (G:29,75% B:0,78%)
13,49% (G:2,68% B:0,08%)
5.3-ply16/15 7/4eq: +0,695 (-0,039)
Player:
Opponent:
85,88% (G:30,28% B:1,02%)
14,12% (G:2,36% B:0,04%)
 
 62: Cannot Move 
XGID=bABBBBBA--------A-bccBc-b-:1:1:-1:62:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=106-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,841
Player:
Opponent:
7,11% (G:1,75% B:0,08%)
92,89% (G:47,70% B:1,05%)
 
 65: 21/16 7/1 
XGID=bABBBBBA--------A-bccBc-b-:1:1:1:65:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=106-108
1.played4-ply21/16 7/1eq: +0,939
Player:
Opponent:
97,01% (G:54,41% B:1,02%)
2,99% (G:0,08% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply16/11 7/1eq: +0,917 (-0,023)
Player:
Opponent:
95,96% (G:52,48% B:0,95%)
4,04% (G:0,25% B:0,01%)
3.2-ply21/16 21/15eq: +0,762 (-0,177)
Player:
Opponent:
89,52% (G:39,08% B:0,87%)
10,48% (G:2,92% B:0,12%)
4.2-ply21/10eq: +0,751 (-0,188)
Player:
Opponent:
89,31% (G:41,51% B:0,98%)
10,69% (G:3,69% B:0,34%)
5.2-ply21/15 16/11eq: +0,749 (-0,191)
Player:
Opponent:
89,20% (G:41,32% B:0,94%)
10,80% (G:3,68% B:0,33%)

Tanaka and Michi have probably secured both the game and the match after completing the six prime.


 
 43: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBBBB---------B-bccAc-b-:1:1:-1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=95-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,939
Player:
Opponent:
2,99% (G:0,08% B:0,00%)
97,01% (G:54,41% B:1,02%)
 
 42: 21/17 16/14 
XGID=bBBBBBB---------B-bccAc-b-:1:1:1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=95-108
1.played4-ply21/17 16/14eq: +0,937
Player:
Opponent:
96,90% (G:53,79% B:0,98%)
3,10% (G:0,05% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply21/15eq: +0,937 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,86% (G:53,80% B:0,99%)
3,14% (G:0,05% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply16/14 16/12eq: +0,936 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,83% (G:53,72% B:0,99%)
3,17% (G:0,06% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply16/10eq: +0,936 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,83% (G:53,64% B:0,98%)
3,17% (G:0,06% B:0,00%)
5.2-ply6/4 6/2eq: +0,635 (-0,303)
Player:
Opponent:
82,91% (G:25,28% B:0,27%)
17,09% (G:2,46% B:0,09%)
 
 44: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBBBB-------A-AAbcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:44:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=89-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,937
Player:
Opponent:
3,10% (G:0,05% B:0,00%)
96,90% (G:53,79% B:0,98%)
 
 33: 17/11 16/10 
XGID=bBBBBBB-------A-AAbcc-c-b-:1:1:1:33:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=89-108
1.xg4-ply16/13 14/5eq: +0,937
Player:
Opponent:
96,88% (G:51,61% B:0,91%)
3,12% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply16/4eq: +0,937 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
96,87% (G:51,78% B:0,91%)
3,13% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply16/10 14/8eq: +0,937 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,85% (G:51,83% B:0,92%)
3,15% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
4.played4-ply17/11 16/10eq: +0,937 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,84% (G:51,80% B:0,91%)
3,16% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
5.4-ply17/8 14/11eq: +0,936 (-0,001)
Player:
Opponent:
96,83% (G:51,79% B:0,92%)
3,17% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
 
 11: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBBBB---AA--A---bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:11:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=77-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,937
Player:
Opponent:
3,16% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
96,84% (G:51,80% B:0,91%)
 
 43: 11/8 10/6 
XGID=bBBBBBB---AA--A---bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=77-108
1.played4-ply11/8 10/6eq: +0,940
Player:
Opponent:
97,01% (G:48,28% B:0,78%)
2,99% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply11/7 10/7eq: +0,936 (-0,004)
Player:
Opponent:
96,83% (G:47,65% B:0,74%)
3,17% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply11/4eq: +0,936 (-0,004)
Player:
Opponent:
96,79% (G:47,61% B:0,77%)
3,21% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply14/10 11/8eq: +0,935 (-0,005)
Player:
Opponent:
96,74% (G:47,94% B:0,78%)
3,26% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply14/7eq: +0,931 (-0,009)
Player:
Opponent:
96,58% (G:52,55% B:0,95%)
3,42% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
 
 22: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBBBC-A-----A---bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:22:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=70-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,940
Player:
Opponent:
2,99% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
97,01% (G:48,28% B:0,78%)
 
 42: 14/10 6/4 
XGID=bBBBBBC-A-----A---bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=70-108
1.played4-ply14/10 6/4eq: +0,949
Player:
Opponent:
97,45% (G:45,52% B:0,67%)
2,55% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply8/4 6/4eq: +0,942 (-0,007)
Player:
Opponent:
97,08% (G:45,27% B:0,67%)
2,92% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply14/10 8/6eq: +0,939 (-0,010)
Player:
Opponent:
96,94% (G:47,23% B:0,73%)
3,06% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply14/12 8/4eq: +0,938 (-0,011)
Player:
Opponent:
96,90% (G:46,37% B:0,71%)
3,10% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply14/8eq: +0,927 (-0,022)
Player:
Opponent:
96,34% (G:49,87% B:0,84%)
3,66% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)

As always in similar positions, the safety of next turn's double sixes are a key factor in deciding what to play.


 
 52: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBCBB-A-A-------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:52:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=64-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,949
Player:
Opponent:
2,55% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
97,45% (G:45,52% B:0,67%)
 
 52: 10/5 8/6 
XGID=bBBBCBB-A-A-------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:52:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=64-108
1.played4-ply10/5 8/6eq: +0,952
Player:
Opponent:
97,60% (G:46,71% B:0,71%)
2,40% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply10/5 4/2eq: +0,946 (-0,006)
Player:
Opponent:
97,32% (G:44,39% B:0,55%)
2,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply6/4 6/1eq: +0,937 (-0,015)
Player:
Opponent:
96,84% (G:36,91% B:0,42%)
3,16% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply10/3eq: +0,936 (-0,016)
Player:
Opponent:
96,78% (G:44,90% B:0,63%)
3,22% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply8/3 4/2eq: +0,927 (-0,025)
Player:
Opponent:
96,34% (G:45,97% B:0,65%)
3,66% (G:0,01% B:0,00%)
 
 52: Cannot Move 
XGID=bBBBCCC-----------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:52:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=57-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,952
Player:
Opponent:
2,40% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
97,60% (G:46,71% B:0,71%)
 
 43: 6/3 5/1 
XGID=bBBBCCC-----------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=57-108
1.played4-ply6/3 5/1eq: +0,958
Player:
Opponent:
97,91% (G:40,45% B:0,49%)
2,09% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply6/2 5/2eq: +0,945 (-0,013)
Player:
Opponent:
97,27% (G:40,40% B:0,46%)
2,73% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply6/3 4/Offeq: +0,937 (-0,021)
Player:
Opponent:
96,85% (G:50,03% B:0,89%)
3,15% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply6/2 4/1eq: +0,905 (-0,053)
Player:
Opponent:
95,26% (G:43,48% B:0,55%)
4,74% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply5/2 4/Offeq: +0,875 (-0,083)
Player:
Opponent:
93,73% (G:51,08% B:0,91%)
6,27% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

No reason to take off any checker. Only priority is to secure the game.


 
 11: Cannot Move 
XGID=bCBCCBB-----------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:11:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=50-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,958
Player:
Opponent:
2,09% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
97,91% (G:40,45% B:0,49%)
 
 32: 6/4 6/3 
XGID=bCBCCBB-----------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:32:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=50-108
1.played4-ply6/4 6/3eq: +0,977
Player:
Opponent:
98,83% (G:34,96% B:0,34%)
1,17% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/2 3/Offeq: +0,939 (-0,037)
Player:
Opponent:
96,95% (G:48,71% B:0,65%)
3,05% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply4/1 3/1eq: +0,923 (-0,054)
Player:
Opponent:
96,15% (G:37,23% B:0,28%)
3,85% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply5/3 5/2eq: +0,909 (-0,067)
Player:
Opponent:
95,45% (G:35,49% B:0,33%)
4,55% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.2-ply6/4 3/Offeq: +0,752 (-0,225)
Player:
Opponent:
87,58% (G:41,85% B:0,63%)
12,42% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)

Again, a single win is all whites need.


 
 42: Cannot Move 
XGID=bCBDDB------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=45-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,980
Player:
Opponent:
1,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
98,99% (G:39,08% B:0,43%)
 
 61: 5/4 5/Off 
XGID=bCBDDB------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:61:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=45-108
1.played3-ply5/4 5/Offeq: +0,962
Player:
Opponent:
98,11% (G:41,17% B:0,57%)
1,89% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.2-ply5/Off 1/Offeq: +0,720 (-0,242)
Player:
Opponent:
86,01% (G:40,42% B:0,72%)
13,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.2-ply5/Off 3/2eq: +0,709 (-0,253)
Player:
Opponent:
85,45% (G:36,00% B:0,44%)
14,55% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.2-ply5/Off 4/3eq: +0,704 (-0,258)
Player:
Opponent:
85,22% (G:34,63% B:0,42%)
14,78% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.1-ply5/Off 2/1eq: +0,226 (-0,736)
Player:
Opponent:
61,32% (G:19,83% B:0,32%)
38,68% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 43: Cannot Move 
XGID=bCBDE-------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:43:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=39-108
1.played4-plyCannot Moveeq: -0,948
Player:
Opponent:
2,58% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
97,42% (G:53,65% B:0,93%)
 
 31: 4/Off 
XGID=bCBDE-------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:31:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=39-108
1.playedXG Roller++4/Offeq: +0,994
Player:
Opponent:
99,72% (G:52,02% B:0,52%)
0,28% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.XG Roller++4/1 3/2eq: +0,978 (-0,017)
Player:
Opponent:
98,89% (G:45,39% B:0,25%)
1,11% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply3/Off 1/Offeq: +0,968 (-0,026)
Player:
Opponent:
98,41% (G:57,74% B:1,14%)
1,59% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.4-ply4/3 4/1eq: +0,940 (-0,054)
Player:
Opponent:
97,02% (G:42,45% B:0,34%)
2,98% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply3/2 3/Offeq: +0,942 (-0,052)
Player:
Opponent:
97,11% (G:48,28% B:0,73%)
2,89% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 51: Bar/20 
XGID=bCBDD-------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:51:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=35-108
1.played3-plyBar/20eq: -0,989
Player:
Opponent:
0,54% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,46% (G:44,53% B:0,17%)
 
 61: 4/3 4/Off 
XGID=aCBDDa------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:1:61:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=35-103
1.played4-ply4/3 4/Offeq: +0,995
Player:
Opponent:
99,74% (G:47,67% B:0,08%)
0,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/Off 3/2eq: +0,976 (-0,019)
Player:
Opponent:
98,82% (G:50,21% B:0,10%)
1,18% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply4/Off 1/Offeq: +0,975 (-0,020)
Player:
Opponent:
98,74% (G:54,36% B:0,21%)
1,26% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.1-ply4/Off 2/1eq: +0,592 (-0,403)
Player:
Opponent:
79,61% (G:22,65% B:0,23%)
20,39% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 55: Bar/5 
XGID=aCBEBa------------bcc-c-b-:1:1:-1:55:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=30-103
1.xg4-plyBar/20 7/2 6/1(2)eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:50,35% B:0,00%)
2.4-plyBar/20 7/2(2) 6/1eq: -1,000 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,99% (G:41,27% B:0,00%)
3.4-plyBar/20 6/1(3)eq: -1,000 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,99% (G:51,34% B:0,00%)
4.4-plyBar/10 7/2eq: -1,000 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:5,47% B:0,00%)
5.played4-plyBar/5eq: -1,000 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:4,04% B:0,00%)
 
 63: 4/Off 3/Off 
XGID=-CBEBa------------bcd-c-b-:1:1:1:63:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=30-83
1.played4-ply4/Off 3/Offeq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
99,98% (G:3,39% B:0,00%)
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply4/1 4/Offeq: +0,999 (0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
99,97% (G:0,58% B:0,00%)
0,03% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 65: 20/9 
XGID=-CBDAa------------bcd-c-b-:1:1:-1:65:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=23-83
1.played4-ply20/9eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,32% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply20/15 7/1eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:2,83% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply20/14 6/1eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:4,25% B:0,00%)
4.3-ply20/14 7/2eq: -1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:1,62% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply7/2 7/1eq: -1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:4,60% B:0,00%)
 
 41: 4/Off 1/Off 
XGID=-CBDA-----------a-bcd-c-b-:1:1:1:41:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=23-72
1.4-ply4/Off 3/2eq: +1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
99,98% (G:0,05% B:0,00%)
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.played4-ply4/Off 1/Offeq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
99,98% (G:1,69% B:0,00%)
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
3.3-ply4/Offeq: +1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
99,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
4.3-ply4/Off 2/1eq: +1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
99,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 63: 9/3 7/4 
XGID=-BBD------------a-bcd-c-b-:1:1:-1:63:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=18-72
1.played4-ply9/3 7/4eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:1,50% B:0,00%)
2.xg4-ply7/4 7/1eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:1,50% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply9/3 6/3eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:1,83% B:0,00%)
4.3-ply9/6 7/1eq: -1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:1,84% B:0,00%)
5.2-ply7/1 6/3eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:2,00% B:0,00%)
 
 63: 3/Off(2) 
XGID=-BBD--------------acdad-b-:1:1:1:63:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=18-63
1.played3-ply3/Off(2)eq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 42: 7/5 4/Off 
XGID=-BBB--------------acdad-b-:1:1:-1:42:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=12-63
1.played4-ply7/5 4/Offeq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
2.4-ply7/3 6/4eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:14,71% B:0,00%)
3.4-ply6/2 5/3eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:20,84% B:0,00%)
4.xg4-ply6/2 3/1eq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:20,84% B:0,00%)
5.3-ply7/5 6/2eq: -1,000 (+0,000)
Player:
Opponent:
0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:14,68% B:0,00%)
 
 33: 3/Off(2) 2/Off(2) 
XGID=-BBB---------------ce-d-b-:1:1:1:33:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=12-57
1.played3-ply3/Off(2) 2/Off(2)eq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 66: 6/Off(3) 5/Off 
XGID=-B-----------------ce-d-b-:1:1:-1:66:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=2-57
1.played3-ply6/Off(3) 5/Offeq: -1,000
Player:
Opponent:
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 11: 1/Off(2) 
XGID=-B------------------d-d-b-:1:1:1:11:5:4:0:7:10 Pip=2-34
1.played3-ply1/Off(2)eq: +1,000
Player:
Opponent:
100,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
0,00% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
 
 Wins a Single Game 2pts. 

Game Summary:

Tanaka,Michi  Category HK 
World Champ. (-0,0029) Total Error World Champ. (-0,0008)
World Champ. (-0,0030) Checker Play World Champ. (-0,0010)
World Champ. (+0,0000) Cube Play World Champ. (+0,0000)
1,46 Performance Rating 0,41
2 Move Errors 0
-0,085(-2,67%) Equity lost (cost) -0,013(-0,45%)
     
0 Double Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
0 Take Errors 0
+0,000 Equity lost (cost) +0,000
     
2 Total Error 0
-0,085(-2,67%) Equity lost (cost) -0,013(-0,45%)
     
2 Jokers 3
+0,687(+34,12%) Luck -0,687(-34,12%)


To my knowledge, this has the lowest, by far, cummulative PR (1,41 and 1,11) in a final match of a recognized backgammon tournament. What is even more impressive is that this match was clocked and was played at 4 o'clock in the morning after many other long matches. Despite those constraints and the fact that there was a big turnaround in the second game, the greek players were not affected and proved that the greek backgammon has considerable developed those last years. Haris and Kostas possible constitute the strongest greek backgammon pair, with their main strength comming from their excellent cooperation.


Export made by eXtreme Gammon 2.03 ©2009-2012 GameSite 2000 Ltd.
on 9/9/2013 7:02:29 PM